Nikon AF-S 24/1.4 vs Sigma 30/1.4. Both on a D90. The AF-S 24/1.4 is a S$2.9k piece of glass.
Test condition : 1/20s, f1.4, ISO 1600. SB-900 AF assist + flash. So shutter is locked at 1/60s, all shot at f1.4 to excerbate AF inaccuracies.
AF, 24/1.4 no horse run. Faster lock-on plus 100% accuracy. I shot a person's face, AF at the nostrils. 5 out of 5 frames nailed it sharp 100% for AF. Center point cross hair AF.
AF Sigma 30mm, hunt a bit, probably 2-3X slower lock-on. 0 out of 5 all back focus for nostrils. WTF?
AF 24/1.4 on person's eyes. Again 5/5 AF nailed it 100%.
AF Sigma 30mm, better. 3 out of 5 frames AF nailed it 100%. Also noticeably slower.
Don't expect the AF-S 24/1.4 to work miracles with the side non-cross-hair AF points. For the Sigma 30/1.4, I usually whack at least 5 frames before I can get 1 to be sharp for shooting people at f1.4-f2 range. :sweat:
Tomorrow shooting Singapore Flyer ROM, so lets see. 5.30-7.30, so there will be a mixture of bright, not so bright, and freaking !@$#!@ dark conditions.
But here's the good news, the Sigma 30/1.4 is nearly as sharp as the AF-S 24/1.4 when it is in focus. I still can see CA in the 24/1.4, but that's on the DX body. If it is working on a FX, probably it would not be stressed as much and can be better (its supposed to be sharp till the corners even on FX - you pay a lot of premium for this for a WA f1.4).