The XTOL developer is my current favorite developer.
It comes in Part-A/Part-B powder packets to be mixed
into a 5 litre solution, it is then commonly mixed at 1+1
dilution during development.
From the diagram above, XTOL gives a good balance
of "Shadow Details" + "Fine Grain" + "Sharpness".
Actually, XTOL's claim to fame is that it is a compensating
developer.
Let me explain, usually, a film has a base ISO which
maximises the shadow details, but this base ISO sometimes isn't
the same ISO as that printed on the box. For example, Fomapan 400
true ISO is around 200-250, while Tri-x is sometimes rated at 320
for optimal ISO. It doesn't mean that the film can't be rated higher
or lower, it is just that at a different iso (say pushed to iso 800) the
images aren't retaining the necessary shadow details.
So here's where XTOL comes in. As a compensating developer, you
can shoot your Tri-x at iso 800 and it will still preserve the shadow
details like tri-x at iso 400. In other words, it is a speed gaining
developer.
Usually, XTOL preserves the speed up to a stop, however, when shooting
at 2 stops from the base ISO, the images are still quite rich compared
to other developers like HC-110 or Rodinal which isn't a compensating
developer.
here's a picture taken with the Leica M3 + 50 Lux,
Neopan 400 pushed to 1600 and developed in XTOL 1+1
for 7mins and 30seconds at 30C.
raytoei
It comes in Part-A/Part-B powder packets to be mixed
into a 5 litre solution, it is then commonly mixed at 1+1
dilution during development.

From the diagram above, XTOL gives a good balance
of "Shadow Details" + "Fine Grain" + "Sharpness".
Actually, XTOL's claim to fame is that it is a compensating
developer.
Let me explain, usually, a film has a base ISO which
maximises the shadow details, but this base ISO sometimes isn't
the same ISO as that printed on the box. For example, Fomapan 400
true ISO is around 200-250, while Tri-x is sometimes rated at 320
for optimal ISO. It doesn't mean that the film can't be rated higher
or lower, it is just that at a different iso (say pushed to iso 800) the
images aren't retaining the necessary shadow details.
So here's where XTOL comes in. As a compensating developer, you
can shoot your Tri-x at iso 800 and it will still preserve the shadow
details like tri-x at iso 400. In other words, it is a speed gaining
developer.
Usually, XTOL preserves the speed up to a stop, however, when shooting
at 2 stops from the base ISO, the images are still quite rich compared
to other developers like HC-110 or Rodinal which isn't a compensating
developer.
here's a picture taken with the Leica M3 + 50 Lux,
Neopan 400 pushed to 1600 and developed in XTOL 1+1
for 7mins and 30seconds at 30C.

raytoei