something more mundane:
Why are they called 4 rings when there seems to be 5 of them?
Your shot seems a bit underexposed. Perhaps pushing the brightness up would help the shot look better.
The number of rings that are referred to in the common names of the Ypthima species are counted from the hindwings only.Here's a blog article on another species of the genus that explains the common name.
well, it was their sleeping time towards the end of the day, so perhaps underexpose is more suitable..
thats the excuse for the new diffuser needing a bit more improvement anyway..
tks.
i juz read THE bk and found the answer too..
Kuan,
What is your equipment setup?
Are your using ""first curtain"" or ""rear syn""( 2nd curtain ) flash ?
Most of us use fill-flash , in this mode the shutter open to let in the ambient light first and the fill flash comes in to illuminate the finer details of the subject just before the shutter second curtain closes. This will render the finer details of the subject better and at the same time a brighter backdrop.
I am using Canon setup and the flash is always pointed at the subject directly without any diffuser . The ETTL of the Canon flash in the rear syn flash mode is intelligent enough to provided the right amount of the "fill-flash" without having to using diffuser.
Cheers!
Hi Tishfire,
1) Orsotriaena medus cinerea (Nigger) thats the name of the butterfly!
2) Ideopsis vulgaris macrina (Blue Glassy Tiger)
3) Leptosia nina malayana (Psyche) Not bad, manage to get a nice and sharp shot of this very skittish butterfly that never seem to land most of the time!
4) 4&5, some skipper, I am really bad at ID-ing skippers! :embrass:
You can try to ID your shots, we do have an online photo checklist @ www.butterflycircle.com/checklist2
cheers!