Since it is voiced out now, i think most of the organisers will tone down abit. However, it's a group effort. If other organisers are still continuing to do it this way, the other organisers might be 'forced' to follow in order not to lose their threads in a pool of much more attractive titles.
Also, letting the moderators judge whether our title is okay or not is unfair, because what's okay to us might not be okay to them, and we might keep getting infringement points for what we dont know.
i think there is nothing much to worry about infringement points -
firstly, there are various degrees of infringement, and clubsnap admin/moderators tend to be rather objective about 90% of the time when it comes to dishing them out. a warning has no bearing on your record, it's not as if it has much negative impact on your life as a organiser.
that said, like some people have mentioned, effectively if there is no demand, there is no supply. for example, you don't see any organisers organising sion's favourite genre of photography.
the main idea here is not to make anyone's life difficult, but rather, a few members being concerned about clubsnap's image, since they care for it. sure, who's to say how much an image actually counts, but i think the people who have an issue with all the sleazy titles are not doing it to stand on a higher moral ground and look down on people who participate.
go ahead with all your policewomen shots, your handcuffs, your japanese girls, so long as the correct procedures are followed and safety is not an issue, i don't think the people who don't really shoot will care. what i really take issue with is whether there is really a point to name the thread titles as such. like i had mentioned to tjhan in his thread (where you have been participating) - there is a huge difference between 2 accurate alternatives to name a thread, that lies in the connotations that come along with the names.
i don't really want to compare, but speaking generally - i'm not sure if you partake in the sleazy thread naming.. there are organisers who achieve great participation rates despite having non-sleazy titles. the pricing is not that attractive as well, (in absolute monetary terms) so where does the success come from? food for thought, don't you think?
