Sex sells


Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think anyone of us have anything against advertisers earning a buck, that's business. But when the advertisers are the ones giving GWC an excuse for their escapism, should't we start with the advertisers? To express an opinion of disapproval is not being elitist, it's a personnal opinion. If this opinion is shared by others and the admins/mods, there's nothing wrong with it.

just because the majority agree on an idea doesn't necessarily make it the right idea. in this case i'd say the escapism for the GWC is the thing that should be tackled not the advertizers...as long as there's the escapism for the advertizers to tap into it will always happen.
 

just because the majority agree on an idea doesn't necessarily make it the right idea. in this case i'd say the escapism for the GWC is the thing that should be tackled not the advertizers...as long as there's the escapism for the advertizers to tap into it will always happen.

Do you fight the fire which is already started or do you prevent the firestarter from starting the fire?
There's just no way to fight a GWC's escapism. No one will even admit that he's a GWC for you to start with, but we can control what is being advertised, right?
 

just because the majority agree on an idea doesn't necessarily make it the right idea.

Actually, in a privately owned forum like CS, a majority is not needed, just the direction of the owners and those who shape it will matter and this don't have to be base on majority. Basing on majority may not always be a good thing.
 

Actually, in a privately owned forum like CS, a majority is not needed, just the direction of the owners and those who shape it will matter and this don't have to be base on majority. Basing on majority may not always be a good thing.

this u and i agree on
 

Do you fight the fire which is already started or do you prevent the firestarter from starting the fire?
There's just no way to fight a GWC's escapism. No one will even admit that he's a GWC for you to start with, but we can control what is being advertised, right?

start profiling lor :bsmilie:
 

Who's paying? :think:

CS will come up with a tax system for organisers to pay... :bsmilie: so those who dun join these shoots not affected, u shoot u pay! :sweatsm:
 

Last edited:
yqt you know its funny that this place is a community of thousands...but only like 30 voices at max have been speaking out about this topic...even the original ts like bo chap liao. so a small sample of the community here doesn't make for enough outrage at the way the organziers are advertising.
 

Last edited:
yqt you know its funny that this place is a community of thousands...but only like 30 voices at max have been speaking out about this topic...even the original ts like bo chap liao. so a small sample of the community here doesn't make for enough outrage at the way the organziers are advertising.

Or maybe there is just a bloody lot of GWCs here but dare not break cover heheheh.... and would that be surprising if 99% are like that on the sly?
 

Or maybe there is just a bloody lot of GWCs here but dare not break cover heheheh.... and would that be surprising if 99% are like that on the sly?

then this place bo hope liao and the thread should be locked lor.
 

then this place bo hope liao and the thread should be locked lor.

Nope you have to do what the police and govt do...set up Geyland, Petain Road and all those wonderful places for some release. You can't stop it but you can control it and limit it. Sometime you don't control or confront the OKT...you can also influence the customers or the "bed workers" eheheheh..... there is always more then one way to get around a problem.
 

yqt you know its funny that this place is a community of thousands...but only like 30 voices at max have been speaking out about this topic...even the original ts like bo chap liao. so a small sample of the community here doesn't make for enough outrage at the way the organziers are advertising.

But are the comments valid? Does it warrant some form of respond? As a forum we can all voice our comments and as a privately owned forum, it's up to the forum owners and the people running it to decide which way to go. If everything must be a BIG enough group or the majority to comments, die liow lar :bsmilie:
 

Nope you have to do what the police and govt do...set up Geyland, Petain Road and all those wonderful places for some release. You can't stop it but you can control it and limit it. Sometime you don't control or confront the OKT...you can also influence the customers or the "bed workers" eheheheh..... there is always more then one way to get around a problem.

Ok, let's do that. Set up a private sub forum and we put you in charge :devil:
 

Ok, let's do that. Set up a private sub forum and we put you in charge :devil:

I will only need one button. "Erase thread" ....it would be a very clean and empty sub-forum heheheh.... so best to forget it.
 

But are the comments valid? Does it warrant some form of respond? As a forum we can all voice our comments and as a privately owned forum, it's up to the forum owners and the people running it to decide which way to go. If everything must be a BIG enough group or the majority to comments, die liow lar :bsmilie:

i'm not asking for majority rule but it seems like NO ONE cares if its only like 5 same people talking about a subject. that or no one else is as prudish as the ones who've been saying its bad ;)
 

Last edited:
yqt you know its funny that this place is a community of thousands...but only like 30 voices at max have been speaking out about this topic...even the original ts like bo chap liao. so a small sample of the community here doesn't make for enough outrage at the way the organziers are advertising.


I have been busy with work. Not Bo chap.

The very reason I started this is because I cared for the forum and its development, like many others who have put in their 2 cents worth.

Its not about destroying free markets nor mod-bashing nor censorship. Its about giving a heads-up for the forum to ask if they are going in the direction that they want.

:)
 

Last edited:
I have been busy with work. Not Bo chap.

The very reason I started this is because I cared for the forum and its development, like many others who have put in their 2 cents worth.

Its not about destroying free markets nor mod-bashing nor censorship. Its about giving a heads-up for the forum to ask if they are going in the direction that they want.

:)

fair enuff about being busy...but unfortunately only a few voices have spoken out about what you said is the direction of the forum...and i stand by what i said 5+ voices do not make a representative sample of the entire community of this forum (not counting the mods).
 

besides no one has answered the q: what gives you the right to go out and police others? the mods here alone have it but i dun see how the other forumers do.

but who has done that here?

no one.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top