Don't hesitate.
It is definitely worth it even if the price was $92 and not $29.
In addition you may get an education in lighting, during the process of understanding how to use this precision instrument.
Don't hesitate.
It is definitely worth it even if the price was $92 and not $29.
In addition you may get an education in lighting, during the process of understanding how to use this precision instrument.
The IV is not the easiest meter to use, but once you get used to it, it's ok (operation wise). Have you checked the exposure calibration against a known meter or flash output?
Oh, BTW, if you're not using the 5deg viewer thingy, can you sell it to me?
The IV is not the easiest meter to use, but once you get used to it, it's ok (operation wise). Have you checked the exposure calibration against a known meter or flash output?
Oh, BTW, if you're not using the 5deg viewer thingy, can you sell it to me?
so far the meter it is giving me is ok... didnt do any adjustment or calibrated anything since i bought it..just compared its reading from my cam..
but i noticed that the circular yellow calibration thingy inside the battery compartment is set to -.2...
Noramally what I do is test one meter against another calibrated meter, or one that is already proven to be accurate, then compare. Also, I would use a good cond Metz hammerhead set manually to counter-check. The old Mets are among the most accurate portable units around.