What would have happened if Olympus did not do something amazing to continue? Amazing or not, breakthrough or not, its pretty subjective you know..?
I'm looking at this from the other perspective. What would you do if it is not good?![]()
I've been thinking about this since the E-3 arrived and disappointed me. I didn't spend any more money on Olympus equipment since then. There were some technical advances over the E-1 but the image quality wasn't really one of them, mainly because of the aggressive anti-aliasing filter.
They've already shown the E-PL1 to have very good image quality, I think that whatever they show, it should be enough to satisfy me, but in 2014, will I be wondering again?
Thankfully, I'm not trying to make money with it now. I would have switched a while back, if I depended on the camera for money still. Pentax is looking very good now. Nikon is looking good, but the lenses are much more expensive than Pentax to get really good image quality.
Six years with the same body is so long and especially since it's only 5 MP. I'd like to continue with Olympus since I have a moderate investment in lenses. I can't threaten them by not continuing but how many others are waiting, like me, for something competitive with other brands?