Hoky said:Is this the RS 60E3 you're referring to??
For $20, it's cheap.
Yupz, it's in an OEM package. Brand new except no box.
Hoky said:Is this the RS 60E3 you're referring to??
For $20, it's cheap.
Actually, IMHO, the main function for the wireless RC-1 or RC-5 is for the photographer to take group photos with him/herself inside the photo. The photographer would be standing together with the group and pressing the wireless remote to trigger the shots. It sure beats having to run to and fro the camera to press the button to trigger the self-timing shots.donkuok said:what about the wireless remote RC-1 or RC-5? Is it useless?
Beaver21 said:Actually, IMHO, the main function for the wireless RC-1 or RC-5 is for the photographer to take group photos with him/herself inside the photo. The photographer would be standing together with the group and pressing the wireless remote to trigger the shots. It sure beats having to run to and fro the camera to press the button to trigger the self-timing shots.
As for the wired RS-60E3, I'd think it's mainly to take night shots, fireworks, slow shutter-speed shots, etc. The photographer would usually be behind the camera (no more than 60cm or 2 ft away) when the shot is taken.
Between the 2, I'd prefer the wireless remote. It may be a little cumbersome to have to point the remote at the sensor but it also serves the function of the RS-60ES. YMMV.
DVDude said:I have both. IMHO the problem with using wireless remotes to perform the phototaking is the inability to preview the AF and Exposure settings during photo taking (There isn't any "half-shutter"). Unless you set it to MF and to M of course.
I would take the RS-60E3 instead since I seldom take grp photos pointing towards self. And from HK, the wired remote is also cheaper!
(RS-60E3 I bought for S$25 (HK$120) vs RC-1 S$34 (HK$160)
Snoweagle said:Yupz, it's in an OEM package. Brand new except no box.
Hoky said:Yo bro, where you get the OEM RS60E3 from?
unseen said:OEM RS60E3 selling for $25 @ TCW (confirmed), $15 at MS Colour (I last heard)
Anyway I made my PDA into an IR Remote with some software. I can trigger either a 300D/350D/D70/s from 10m away (last tested). Works just like the RC1.
I dunno why, 350D not 100% reliable with IR remote. sometimes can sometimes cannot. Last time before the firmware upgrade it was lagi worse, work only 20% of the time. Now it's possibly due to my gaffer tapes.
unseen said:Anyway I made my PDA into an IR Remote with some software. I can trigger either a 300D/350D/D70/s from 10m away (last tested). Works just like the RC1.
I dunno why, 350D not 100% reliable with IR remote. sometimes can sometimes cannot. Last time before the firmware upgrade it was lagi worse, work only 20% of the time. Now it's possibly due to my gaffer tapes.
unseen said:LOL try use a mirror or something wor.. can reflect the IR beam one on glass/mirrorthen wun need to stand with hand in front..
Anyway if you read the canon site, the 350D firmware upgrade was mainly to fix the IR remote shutter problem (one whole firmware upgrade just to fix it). Anyway for me sometimes it doesn't even help if you go closer, muz switch through all the modes then it'll be ok again..![]()
unseen said:lol maybe coz i knew the pple there? hmmmm well tell them ur friend got it for $25? LOL anyway this one got box and instruction etc too. Just that not canon box.![]()
unseen said:lol maybe coz i knew the pple there? hmmmm well tell them ur friend got it for $25? LOL anyway this one got box and instruction etc too. Just that not canon box.![]()