reachme2003 said:not all MPs' intervention will help matters.
u mean something to do with the party his from? hehe
ok enff...i dunwan to get into trouble.... i will stop here.... hehe
reachme2003 said:not all MPs' intervention will help matters.
jlchong said:sigh.. perhaps if the police have acted faster, the culprit may not have the time to sell the stuff.
I believe KT should ask for an explaination on why the men in blue took so long to act even though KT had supplied all the evidence.
Redstar202 said:I am sure that the Police will still be looking at other avenues of recovering the items. It would be easier to track if the person had sold it, but if 'suay suay' he had dumped it somewhere after suffering from a panic attack.... then the chances of recovery is slim.
IMHO, KT will be better off seeking legal advice than approaching his MP. There is nothing the MP can do except perhaps asking the Police for updates.
Totally agree.evq said:What u expect? Police to withdraw $$ from his bank a/c & return to KT?
They can only try to find out where he disposed the stolen stuff & retrieve whatever they can.
Anyway, justice is done & he will be serving his time.
Btw, he was caught in the act(by CCTV), not while selling the stuff.
A very good idea. But be very careful as the case is ongoing.pianodancer said:I skimmed through this thread and I would like to offer some suggestion (pardon me if it's already been suggested): the Power of the Press.
If any one of you have any contacts, be it TV (Channel U current affair talks) or newspaper (ST Home, TODAY, Wanbao) or publications, it is probably a good idea to share the tormented story to them and let the press work its magic. It's a worthy real-life news, a wake-up call for people who lost their possessions thinking that by tracing the person who took it, they will get back the item, be it intact or in the form of monetary terms.
KT, perhaps you could summarise the chronology of events so that anyone with connections could forward to the press, instead of writing their own version, which could be misinformed.
Agree.pipefish said:The last route is a legal proceeding in the subordinate courts. You should do this after the criminal case. A successful criminal case almost always leads to a successful civil action because the standards applied in criminal cases are higher. If you engage a cheap lawyer, there may some surplus left for you.
jeremyftk said:I think that KT may have to get lawyer liaoz... Sorry bro. But seriously, if they can't recover your gear, perhaps a settlement could be a way out for this guy. PM me if you need help and I'll see if I can get any of my lawyer friends to give you some free advise...![]()
AEC said:Under the PENAL CODE (CAP 224) REVISED EDITION 1985, s403, Dishonest misappropriation of property :
Whoever dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use movable property, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.
Explanation 1.
A dishonest misappropriation for a time only is a misappropriation within the meaning of this section.
Explanation 2.
A person who finds property not in the possession of any other person, and takes such property for the purpose of protecting it for, or of restoring it to the owner, does not take or misappropriate it dishonestly, and is not guilty of an offence; but he is guilty of the offence above defined, if he appropriates it to his own use, when he knows or has the means of discovering the owner, or before he has used reasonable means to discover and give notice to the owner, and has kept the property a reasonable time to enable the owner to claim it.
What are reasonable means, or what is a reasonable time in such a case, is a question of fact.
It is not necessary that the finder should know who is the owner of the property, or that any particular person is the owner of it; it is sufficient if, at the time of appropriating it, he does not believe it to be his own property, or in good faith believe that the real owner cannot be found.
Illustrations
(a) A finds a dollar on the high road, not knowing to whom the dollar belongs. A picks up the dollar. Here A has not committed the offence defined in this section.
(b) A finds a letter on the high road, containing a bank note. From the direction and contents of the letter he learns to whom the note belongs. He appropriates the note. He is guilty of an offence under this section.
(c) A finds a cheque payable to bearer. He can form no conjecture as to the person who has lost the cheque. But the name of the person who has drawn the cheque appears. A knows that this person can direct him to the person in whose favour the cheque was drawn. A appropriates the cheque without attempting to discover the owner. He is guilty of an offence under this section.
(d) A sees Z drop his purse with money in it. A picks up the purse with the intention of restoring it to Z, but afterwards appropriates it to his own use. A has committed an offence under this section.
(e) A finds a purse with money, not knowing to whom it belongs; he afterwards discovers that it belongs to Z, and appropriates it to his own use. A is guilty of an offence under this section.
(f) A finds a valuable ring, not knowing to whom it belongs. A sells it immediately without attempting to discover the owner. A is guilty of an offence under this section.
ortega said:no harm trying right, maybe can move maybe cannot
talk talk talk here is of no use, might as well talk to the MP
jeremyftk said:I think that KT may have to get lawyer liaoz... Sorry bro. But seriously, if they can't recover your gear, perhaps a settlement could be a way out for this guy. PM me if you need help and I'll see if I can get any of my lawyer friends to give you some free advise...![]()
Redstar202 said:IMHO, KT will be better off seeking legal advice than approaching his MP. There is nothing the MP can do except perhaps asking the Police for updates.
pianodancer said:I skimmed through this thread and I would like to offer some suggestion (pardon me if it's already been suggested): the Power of the Press.
If any one of you have any contacts, be it TV (Channel U current affair talks) or newspaper (ST Home, TODAY, Wanbao) or publications, it is probably a good idea to share the tormented story to them and let the press work its magic. It's a worthy real-life news, a wake-up call for people who lost their possessions thinking that by tracing the person who took it, they will get back the item, be it intact or in the form of monetary terms.
KT, perhaps you could summarise the chronology of events so that anyone with connections could forward to the press, instead of writing their own version, which could be misinformed.