I was thinking that but i keep hearing people say the 24-70mm is much better than the 24-105mm.... help here?
i used both the 24-105 & 24-70 prior to purchasing either... i used an APSC EOS 60D body...
when it is time to buy it myself, i decided to go with the 24-105mm. here are the reasons:
1. for most low light situation i'm shooting, f2.8 isn't that great too... though i must say f4 is worst. but with a speedlight, pairing the 24-105mm with a flash seems to work better for me in indoor low light situation.
2. plus the versatility of having the 24-105 focal range .
3. 24-70 seems to vary with different copies, i tested 2 copies and wasn't impressed with one but impressed with the next.
4. 24-70's constant f2.8 is very impressive in decently lighted conditions, but i decided to invest in primes to help me in that situations... works wonders.
5. Weight!~ maybe it may not bother some people... "more weight, better build, balanced with camera body+grip".... but after using 24-70mm for 5 hours of constant shooting, the weight will start taking a toll on you.
But... with 60D, i'm not impressed with the wider end of both 24mm's.... it equates to about 38mm... and i find myself reaching for the 10-22mm most of the time for indoor shoots. Also, if you are not intending on upgrading to full frame.... i would say 17-55mm f2.8 is a winner for apsc.... the reason why i skipped it is because i made plans to upgrade to full frame... and i did...
but if you really wanna choose from the lists you mentioned, i think the combination: 35L + 24-105L works . maybe throw in a cheap 430ex II speedlite just in case.
