Re: EXPOSE yourself - XC

[Leong23]

I would't mind that... Haha...

To me is not "I wouldn't mind that", is "I WANT THAT!!!!" :bsmilie:

 

[Leong23]

sugar comments :bsmilie:

recently got some ppl made nonconstructive comment once, I gave benefit of doubt.

now they take it to pm and send love letter. want to comment, I'm always open. tell you nicely once to be constructive, but the same thing continues, either you are too thick or you just want to provoke a response, so they have been put on ignore list :devil:

They are so manja. :bsmilie:

 

[night86mare]

They are so manja. :bsmilie:

hahaha...

i very long never play with cats...

tonight i go and ka cheow the ones downstairs. :devil::lovegrin:

 

[Numnumball]

CS difficult to give constructive critiques, wait kena wack by fanboys. :bsmilie:

If i start to give, confirm will emo lots of people. :devil:

:bsmilie:

aiyoh, but better emo den can self reflect mah..

else happy happy post thot pics are gd in fact they are not, make mistake aso dunoe, will nv learn along way le.. i rather someone nitpick at my pics den jus say "Nice!" , "Great Shot" instead...

 

[andrewtansj]

sugar comments :bsmilie:

recently got some ppl made nonconstructive comment once, I gave benefit of doubt.

now they take it to pm and send love letter. want to comment, I'm always open. tell you nicely once to be constructive, but the same thing continues, either you are too thick or you just want to provoke a response, so they have been put on ignore list :devil:

maybe they think easiest way to get shot to fame in CS is to challenge NM...:bsmilie: coz get more exposure :bsmilie:

 

[night86mare]

Just brush them aside.. Ppl like Soulfly, Emlee, Tuarean will give constructive feedbacks..
I yearn for more constructive critiques on my work too... Bt don't get many

Btw ur inbox shd be flooded with love letters everyday :bsmilie:

yar, it is good when they explain in slightly greater detail. i'm not a net nazi, i don't need people to give me an essay on why they think something is good, or why something is bad.

there is no value added when you tell someone "your work is bad". this is only called for when the person is obviously oblivious to it (e.g. the people in P&P that post 40 photos that are focused on chest area). otherwise, if people seemed to have put some thought into their work, you should reciprocate in some way by putting some thought into your critique.

otherwise it's almost insulting, like you can't be bothered.

if you can't be bothered, then i can't be bothered with you also... :bsmilie:

 

[andrewtansj]

:bsmilie:

aiyoh, but better emo den can self reflect mah..

else happy happy post thot pics are gd in fact they are not, make mistake aso dunoe, will nv learn along way le.. i rather someone nitpick at my pics den jus say "Nice!" , "Great Shot" instead...

i just need my gf to tell me my leica very beautiful and the picture taken with it very nice :bsmilie:

 

[Numnumball]

Leong, posting in NPSS will get constructive feedbacks one right?

saw ur mangrove marshal

 

[night86mare]

CS difficult to give constructive critiques, wait kena wack by fanboys. :bsmilie:

If i start to give, confirm will emo lots of people. :devil:

yar, especially in P&P. :bsmilie:

i usually put in more effort when the work is very good, but just lacks something.

when it is very bad, sometimes i just comment very briefly to highlight that it is not something desirable. don't see how constructive feedback would work in such a case, since the comments will be the same, touching on the basics.

one of the P&P guru always oversharpen his photos, always shoot too close for whatever lens he is using, resulting in bloated face model... :bsmilie:

 

[night86mare]

maybe they think easiest way to get shot to fame in CS is to challenge NM...:bsmilie: coz get more exposure :bsmilie:

:dunno: if you comment with smiley face or animated gif, you only look like a fool or a troll.

either way is shoot to fame... in the wrong way.. :bsmilie:

 

[Numnumball]

yar, it is good when they explain in slightly greater detail. i'm not a net nazi, i don't need people to give me an essay on why they think something is good, or why something is bad.

there is no value added when you tell someone "your work is bad". this is only called for when the person is obviously oblivious to it (e.g. the people in P&P that post 40 photos that are focused on chest area). otherwise, if people seemed to have put some thought into their work, you should reciprocate in some way by putting some thought into your critique.

otherwise it's almost insulting, like you can't be bothered.

if you can't be bothered, then i can't be bothered with you also... :bsmilie:

:bsmilie:

Yar lor.. agreed to a certain extent, we dont require indepth explanation why this is bad, but since if whoever labelled them as bad or unplesant to their "high" standards, they ought to at least fill us in more specifically which areas that can be improved.. tsk tsk..

 

[Numnumball]

IR Shooters~!!!!

Getting one this week,

But cant decide between Hoya R72 and B+W 092...hmm...

try to search online but doesnt seem to have an image comparison on the following two filters wor..

 

[night86mare]

going on pm leave this thu.

 

[night86mare]

IR Shooters~!!!!

Getting one this week,

But cant decide between Hoya R72 and B+W 092...hmm...

try to search online but doesnt seem to have an image comparison on the following two filters wor..

the difference is cutoff in light at what wavelength...

B+W 092 cuts off light at 650nm thereabouts, i think. i would consider it more of a red filter.

B+W 093 will be closer to hoya r72, which cuts off light at 720nm..

092 usually produces bluish foliage, whereas hoya r72 will give whitish foliage. the higher the number for cutoff, the more ir characteristic (and the less color) you will get.

hope this helps.

 

[Numnumball]

the difference is cutoff in light at what wavelength...

B+W 092 cuts off light at 650nm thereabouts, i think. i would consider it more of a red filter.

B+W 093 will be closer to hoya r72, which cuts off light at 720nm..

092 usually produces bluish foliage, whereas hoya r72 will give whitish foliage. the higher the number for cutoff, the more ir characteristic (and the less color) you will get.

hope this helps.

It certainly does. Tks Bro

Shd settles for a Hoya in tat case.. BBB! :devil:

 

[Numnumball]

going on pm leave this thu.

shiok, can go chase sunset

 

[andrewtansj]

It certainly does. Tks Bro

Shd settles for a Hoya in tat case.. BBB! :devil:

BBB!!!

 

[night86mare]

shiok, can go chase sunset

probably not, but can go gai gai with van

 

[Numnumball]

probably not, but can go gai gai with van

wah, so lomantic.. can go kah cheow cats aso :heart:

 

[Numnumball]

BBB!!!

Bro, which one u got? i kind of like thw white foliage tat R72 produced :heart:

Coutersy of betterphoto.com