Originally posted by Jethro
So is a rangefinder camera a better and sharper image for taking group pictures such as football team and class photos( under low ligting conditions)?:light:
Originally posted by ed9119
"not true. the rangefinder cameras are obsolete now and you need to compose/focus your picture manually which slows down your pciture taking"
Isnt that supposed to be GOOD?
Obsolete? My Contax G2 has TWO focusing systems (one active and one passive) and my 40 year old russian rangefinder will work without batteries. Old technology does not mean bad/useless technology.
Originally posted by Flare
wah cheem.... Need to channel all my chi to eyes first... hee hee... Or use my Minolta D 5 as a super big and expensive light meter... But then, a bit lose the point... So anything to recommend to someone who is a student and works in coffee bean so that he can buy camera equipments? I guess I'll prefer 35mm...
Originally posted by StreetShooter
Just say NO.
*I do not need a rangefinder... I do not need a rangefinder...*