geraldkhoo
Senior Member
I was just wondering, is it ok for CS members who buy low and sell higher all in CS B&S section? I heard abt it before, but I just noticed it myself... so I'm just wondering 

I am also wondering, is it ok for Singaporeans to buy low and sell high in property or stock market? If is ok, why not in CS B&S section? If not, which law prohibits that? If the law does not prohibits that, why should CS? Please don't get me wrong, I am not saying anything about right or wrong. But it is a free market in a free country. Once your item is sold to another person, it becomes his property and it is entirely up to him to do whatever he likes with it, be it selling it at a skyhigh price or giving it away free.
i agree about free markets
but someone passing himself off as a normal member when they are actually using cs as a grounds for trading and revenue, how does the mod/admin team feel about that?
i agree about free markets
but someone passing himself off as a normal member when they are actually using cs as a grounds for trading and revenue, how does the mod/admin team feel about that?
lol... u must be joking. do you know how much is all the consumers goods in SG??so should mods buy up all the stocks and markup then resell to the members? then how does the 2nd hand shops around peninsular feel?
lol... u must be joking. do you know how much is all the consumers goods in SG??
look at china products...
i'm already LLST when i saw more china brands comes out and went to china recently was disappoint with their products as no matter how much you can bargain, you are still the carrot head to them. :bsmilie:thats y i think its impossible... so how should the mods feel? lan lan lor... :bsmilie:
i'm already LLST when i saw more china brands comes out and went to china recently was disappoint with their products as no matter how much you can bargain, you are still the carrot head to them. :bsmilie:
i think what ts is trying to say is the sellers who are using cs as a trading platform to buy and sell second-hand equipment should be classified differently from a genuine owner who is selling his personal equipment.
i have seen a couple of same sellers who claim they are selling their endless personal equipment.
of cos i know is 40ft ones...(maybe shipments) not the lunch boxes.well u're confirm a carrot when u pay S$1 for something worth RMB$1... you'll probably start earning when you ship in containers... not toyogo containers... i mean those 40ft ones...
well, stepping out of the circle and look, how to control?
tell them to stop, they reg new nick
tell them to pay fee, they reg new nick
ban them already, confirm another new nick...
those are people in the 'dark', we don't even know them, how the hell we control their activities? even no need new nicks... there is 101 ways to buy without even a slightest link to the selling acct.
that is why police will never be out of jobs, just help abit when possible but of cos be merciful.ts is identifying a problem. need to brainstorm a solution lor. that's what you are here for and your contribution to cs is priceless. :bsmilie:
anyways there are some very obvious sellers who are using this as a platform for business. i can easily identify one in the space of 1 week he has posted 20 items to sell.
so should mods buy up all the stocks and markup then resell to the members? then how does the 2nd hand shops around peninsular feel?
I do understand what you are saying... but maybe I did not ask my question clearly.
If doing this is ok, then could this be considered as doing "business"? I know that CS catergorizes different users. Some are members, and then there are advertisers, etc. If this is liken to be a "business", should the person be categorized as an advertiser or reseller?
In the past, some friends pointed me to some sellers in CS who seem to always have stocks to sell, and sometimes repeated items. Then there are some who buy from B&S and then sell it at a higher price.
Like I mentioned, I'm just wondering...![]()
sorry, i don't get what you are saying....
anyways, i understand that there are policing constraints.. what i think i want to know is if there will be action taken on cases whereby you can prove that the person is engaging in such activity.