Once u know where are the dusts, it's pretty much easy and faster. But I don't post process all my photos though; Moreover this is towards the end of my trip, thus I'm lucky lah haha.
But it can be very tedious when i have to do this (touch-up) for 100++ pic..The 1st pic looks very grainy although i used ISO 200 f22, don't know why ? any tool in PS to improve it ?
Saw that u got some help to touch up ur picture man... Happy for u!!!
Regards!
Alan Chua
Chew Siow Ming said:
But it can be very tedious when i have to do this (touch-up) for 100++ pic..The 1st pic looks very grainy although i used ISO 200 f22, don't know why ? any tool in PS to improve it ?
But it can be very tedious when i have to do this (touch-up) for 100++ pic..The 1st pic looks very grainy although i used ISO 200 f22, don't know why ? any tool in PS to improve it ?
grainy? not sure...:dunno: all i know is the 1st pic you post have undergone far too much jpg compression. try posting a higher quality and slightly bigger pic.
and yes y do you need to use f22? it just make dust on sensor more obvious. f11 could do the job in this case, unless you wan to make the water look silky which is not the case for the pic.
grainy? not sure... all i know is the 1st pic you post have undergone far too much jpg compression. try posting a higher quality and slightly bigger pic.
and yes y do you need to use f22? it just make dust on sensor more obvious. f11 could do the job in this case, unless you wan to make the water look silky which is not the case for the pic.
I re-sized to 600X400 & compressed to midium with PS for web posting, due limited file size for CS pic posting. original file size ~ 3Mb, any suggesstion ?
By the way how do you tell the pic has gone thru' too much jpg compression.
Reason using f22 is to get long depth-of-field & get everything in focus, since using tripod, take the oppotunity to use f22. yr opinion f11 sufficiant for scenary like this ???