Ignoring portfolio, would you hire an uncle with really outdated camera system but have 20 years of experience vs rookie with all the modern gear under the sky if their prices are the same?
Ignoring portfolio, would you hire an uncle with really outdated camera system but have 20 years of experience vs rookie with all the modern gear under the sky if their prices are the same?
hypothetical.1. You can't ignore portfolio. That's like saying you want to hire a chef without tasting his food.
2. Are you asking a hypothetical question? Because the answer is clearly dependent on whether you value results. Equipment is necessary but not sufficient to produce good results. So if you want good results, it's clear who you should hire.
hypothetical.
would you hire an experienced but outdated which could mean film camera or a rookie but cutting edge digital system including photoshop with both saying they can give you the pictures you want.
hypothetical.
would you hire an experienced but outdated which could mean film camera or a rookie but cutting edge digital system including photoshop with both saying they can give you the pictures you want.
exactly...1. Film is not outdated.
2. Hypothetically, I'd have to say I pay for results, not equipment. When I go to a restaurant I don't ask what kife the chef uses, what oven he uses, etc. So why should I care what camera he uses?
Ignoring portfolio, would you hire an uncle with really outdated camera system but have 20 years of experience vs rookie with all the modern gear under the sky if their prices are the same?