I dont feel like these were good photos....anybody can help how to improve it?
I wanted your opinion about this - do you have a lot of noise for low light shots? Do you use a tripod often with low light shots?
I'm aware that in ideal conditions, the G1 excels in image quality.
Were any of you converts from a Nikon DSLR or Canon etc i.e. a full fledged DSLR to G1?
I'm aware that to get the best results from low light shots a tripod is a must. But have any of you taken photos inside a party, a restaurant etc..and setting a tripod is a bit of a bother?
How did the G1 do for noise? I'm not too fond of pushing ISO past 400 honestly. I've read that it DOES have problems with noise > 1600 under low light conditions? Has this been a problem with any of you? Without post processing of course
RE: Ideal conditions - yes I agree a compact could take good sharp photos but to a certain extent. I've seen some shots from a DSLR under good conditions that would make my Fuji F100D look amateurish.
RE: whether G1 is a full fledged DSLR - I think that's a contentious point. Some purists would argue that it's not.
DCR-150
![]()
Or
DCR-250
![]()
Both of them is wat price and how good are they at taking Macro photos?
The difference between FT and mFT is not just the absence of the pentaprism, but the absence of the mirror too.G1 is also a "full-fledged" DSLR, just that there's no prism inside the camera due to the shorter mount between sensor and lens.
Anyone knows the lens to flange distance for micro 4/3 mounting? for eg. its 44mm for EF, 42mm for FD and 43.5mm for MD![]()
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmcg1/ said:![]()
Olympus and Panasonic announced the new, mirrorless format / lens mount based on (and compatible with) Four Thirds in August 2008. The Micro Four Thirds system uses the same sensor size (18 x 13.5 mm) but allows slimmer cameras by removing the mirror box and optical viewfinder. The new format has three key technical differences: (1) roughly half the flange back distance (distance from mount to the sensor), (2) a smaller diameter lens mount (6 mm smaller) and (3) two additional contact points for lens-to-body communication (now 11 points). Removing the mirror mechanism allows this shorter flange back distance, meaning lenses for the new mount can be considerably smaller than current Four Thirds designs. The format will require framing to be carried out using Live View on either the LCD monitor or an EVF. Existing Four Thirds lenses can be used on Micro Four Thirds cameras using an adapter.
:thumbsup:G1 + Sigma (Nikon Mount) 20/f1.8
![]()
:thumbsup:
Outstanding image!
love it... love it... love it!! :heart:
../azul123
G1 + Sigma (Nikon Mount) 20/f1.8
![]()
Amazing shot... :thumbsup:
Can only come from a lady...
Guys.... u can flame. me for this...