my focus got dust particles, only can be seen through viewfinder.
2 weeks old model. sad, viewfinder trapped dust to easily
Official Canon EOS 60D User Thread Part II
- Thread starter jamesaw
- Start date
2 weeks old model. sad, viewfinder trapped dust to easily
$715 VC from alan
xSuicidaLx
New Member
Hey guys. 60d user here
Any1 knows the going rate for a 2nd hand 70-200 f2.8 non is?
Looking at adding 1 to my arsenal. Rented 1 for a motorbike track shoot and loved the pics that came out!
Thanks
Any1 knows the going rate for a 2nd hand 70-200 f2.8 non is?
Looking at adding 1 to my arsenal. Rented 1 for a motorbike track shoot and loved the pics that came out!
Thanks
Took the plunge yesterday with 60D body....and I decided to buy the 15-85mm EFS.... all I can say is very good lens. Even my wife can take fantastic pix under very low light condition. Highly recommended with the 60D.
This lens should be a keeper since I dont think I will go FF.... no need to spend obscene amount to get good pix. The composition is more important imo.
Last edited:
The L 2.8 Non IS? About 1.3 range last month I saw in BnS.
SilentSeth
New Member
Hi Gunston, you can go to Canon centre in Vivo City.. I think you can buy there & they will do it for you.
yeoenghwee
Member
Hi All,
Seems like the thread have stop posting for a while. Would like to check with the ground does anyone suffer from soft focusing issue when using the 60D? I feel my is quite soft as compare to my previous 550D. Need your kind advice on the following. Thanks
Seems like the thread have stop posting for a while. Would like to check with the ground does anyone suffer from soft focusing issue when using the 60D? I feel my is quite soft as compare to my previous 550D. Need your kind advice on the following. Thanks
coolhand57
Member
Hi,Im a 60D-er too,for about 3 months now.
My match is, a 10-24 Tamron (seldom use) and 150-500 Sigma (almost all the time since last month for nature).
Planning for 1 or 2 primes (50/85/135/200) and a walk around (17-55/85, 24-70 or 28-105).
Ive read everyone praising the 17-50 Tammy. I dont have it is because i bought it in a hurry and it lacks reach for me..i shouldve got the Tokina instead..oh well,i like the coverage anyway, so its ok.
Currently, am hunting a cheap walk around lens.
Still,i love nature (can be landscape/sunrise/set and birding). Anyone who enjoys this, please feel free to contact me. And, if any of you guys are organising a gathering shooting, i will be more than happy to join if available.
Happy shootin'!!!
My match is, a 10-24 Tamron (seldom use) and 150-500 Sigma (almost all the time since last month for nature).
Planning for 1 or 2 primes (50/85/135/200) and a walk around (17-55/85, 24-70 or 28-105).
Ive read everyone praising the 17-50 Tammy. I dont have it is because i bought it in a hurry and it lacks reach for me..i shouldve got the Tokina instead..oh well,i like the coverage anyway, so its ok.
Currently, am hunting a cheap walk around lens.
Still,i love nature (can be landscape/sunrise/set and birding). Anyone who enjoys this, please feel free to contact me. And, if any of you guys are organising a gathering shooting, i will be more than happy to join if available.
Happy shootin'!!!
SilentSeth
New Member
Hi there, generallly speaking (sharpness, focal range for a WA lens) it is good enough. But if you want a detailed report you can googling for reviews.
Consider the tamron 11-16mm. I own it and totally adore it
It has many good reviews online too
coolhand57
Member
Nedy77,you mean Tokina right?
Zennith
New Member
and its much cheaper than the 10-22.
coolhand57
Member
8MM,fisheye?
I am thinkg of the 85,but unsure. Coz im more a birding person.
I am thinkg of the 85,but unsure. Coz im more a birding person.
SilentSeth
New Member
Birding with a 85mm? I thought you gotta go with at least 300mm?
Same thoughts
I m not a birding person
But if not long enough, it mean having to go nearer the bird which might scare it away right?
Similar threads
