There is a sigma 17-50 f2.8, heard good reviews about it. The 28-75 is from tamron I think.
Sigma 17-50?I thought its Tamron?
There is a sigma 17-50 f2.8, heard good reviews about it. The 28-75 is from tamron I think.
Sigma 17-50?I thought its Tamron?
It's a new one from sigma. Here is photozone.de review http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/531-sigma1750f28os
Hi Everyone!~
1 more 550D User here!~![]()
Hi Everyone!~
1 more 550D User here!~![]()
Welcome welcome
sorry if this sounds stupid. but i would like to know , what exactly defines a wide angle lens? is it the wider aperture, the wider angle it gets hence called wide angle?or is it about the focal length?
i have seen liked 50mm, f 1.4. and then from sigma, 17-70mm f 2.8 - (forgot) . so its the length or is it the aperture that made it wide angle?
newbie in photography.and a 550D user. hope you guys wont mind me asking like that caused i really wanna learn![]()
The focal length defines the type of angle wide angle lens. Widest for APS-C cameras is the new sigma 8-16mm. For your cam from Canon, it will be the 10-22mm f3.5-4.5. Which will be equivalent to 16-35.mm due to the crop sensor of 1.6x.
Check it out here for Canon lenses
http://www.canon.com.sg/personal/products/dslrs/lenses
The "f" defines how "fast" it is. The lower/smaller the f stop the the faster/wider it is. So lenses with lower f number would cost more..
Hi compgen,
Where u got ur Phottix BP-550D ?? hw is it?? I thinking of getting 1 also...
Hi guys,
new 550d owner join d club..nice to meet u all here..![]()
today i was at sim lim, checking the price of sigma 17-70mm lens. after getting quoted, bally photo tried hard sell me their steinser conversion lens. they show me how they put it onto the 18-55mm lens of a canon dslr, and then say it can do macro + wide angle.
anyway im not very sure why many say conversion lens is not good. mind sharing why?
Sim lim is a scary place for ppl who are new. They can be very convincing to get ppl to buy stuff that are inferior or they dun need. Go try funan, its a little better but still do ur homework before u go. And yea conversion is nt good likes soons said.so am i right to say the shorter the wider the angle it gives? instead of just looking at the aperture, i should look at the focal length instead when considering ?^^
today i was at sim lim, checking the price of sigma 17-70mm lens. after getting quoted, bally photo tried hard sell me their steinser conversion lens. they show me how they put it onto the 18-55mm lens of a canon dslr, and then say it can do macro + wide angle.
anyway im not very sure why many say conversion lens is not good. mind sharing why?
so am i right to say the shorter the wider the angle it gives? instead of just looking at the aperture, i should look at the focal length instead when considering ?^^
today i was at sim lim, checking the price of sigma 17-70mm lens. after getting quoted, bally photo tried hard sell me their steinser conversion lens. they show me how they put it onto the 18-55mm lens of a canon dslr, and then say it can do macro + wide angle.
anyway im not very sure why many say conversion lens is not good. mind sharing why?
Don't know. Think killerslayer92 mentioned before that looking from the design and position of the screw point, it should be the same.
Anyway up to you to decide. But there isn't much different in price btw Phottix and other 3rd parties (in eBay), so why not just get Phottix?