my IS is on. but whenever object moves or i shake e camera.. e shots becomes either blur or there is motion... is there a way to prevent that?
dood...IS is there to reduce the effect of handshake. Nothing else:sweat:
Not really, one case is when your hand shake is capture by the camera because of too long an exposure (slow shutter speed), the other case is because your subject is dancing all around you. No tripod, IS or any stable hands in the world can save a picture if you have a dancing subject. Except a Fast shutter speed.Aren't both cases the same? (I think)
+1, the IS functions only to reduce (but not completely eliminate) unwanted camera shake caused by YOU, so a slower than normal shutter speed can be used. If your subject is moving and you want a sharp shot, a slow shutter speed is the very last thing you need and IS is pretty much useless here, the only solution is to use a fast lens/high ISO combo or flash.Not really, one case is when your hand shake is capture by the camera because of too long an exposure (slow shutter speed), the other case is because your subject is dancing all around you. No tripod, IS or any stable hands in the world can save a picture if you have a dancing subject. Except a Fast shutter speed.
Hi,
I bought a EOS500D Kit 1 recently and thinking of getting a zoom lens as i will be going to japan for holiday. As i m a newbie, i urgently need suggestions on what kind of lens should i get? Is getting canon zoom lens (eg. EF-S 55-250mm IS) advisable/useful? i will be taking mostly landscape, scenery and portaits photos. my budget is less than $700.
Thanks!!
Thats only partly true. Telephoto lens can be used for landscape photography if you want a certain effect.For landscape and scenery, usually people like to shoot with wide angle, which your 18-55mm kit lens is quite capable of.
55-250mm is a tele-zoom lens, which may not suit what you intent to photograph.
Quite. The ONLY thing the 18-55 does better is that it has a closer focusing distance (20cm) versus the 17-55’s 45cm. It may be more handy for pseudo-macro shots if you don’t want that sort of thing.thx for the replies!
is it right to say if i have the 17-55, i do not need the 18-55?
thanks, i am quite sure i will be getting body only + 17-55 lens. save up the $200 or so from not getting kit I and put that towards the 17-55. just waiting to see 550D's pricing first before i take the plunge (and if i decide on 500D, hope price will drop further too ;p )Quite. The ONLY thing the 18-55 does better is that it has a closer focusing distance (20cm) versus the 17-55s 45cm. It may be more handy for pseudo-macro shots if you dont want that sort of thing.
Personally I wont sell the 18-55. It goes for peanuts on the forum (90+ only) and you might as well keep it as a back up, say when a family member wants to borrow your DSLR and you dont trust the person with your very precious 17-55.![]()