Official 5D User Thread

[Jazzmint90]

All L lenses are EF lenses, but not all EF lenses are L lenses. So L lenses are a subset of EF lenses. There are some very nice lenses that are not Ls, like the 85mm f/1.8, so don't discount all non-Ls.

Haha yes. Dun worry. I am not discounting non Ls lens.

Just wanna know the differences b/w them from L lens users.

 

[neech7]

Haha yes. Dun worry. I am not discounting non Ls lens.

Just wanna know the differences b/w them from L lens users.

Lenses are designated L when Canon says it is. There is no hard definition. Many of them have nicer features like USM motor, FTM focusing, metal barrel, non-rotating front element, constant aperture, etc. Then again, many non-Ls also have these features. One thing for sure, none of the EF-S lenses are Ls.

 

[Snoweagle]

Lenses are designated L when Canon says it is. There is no hard definition. Many of them have nicer features like USM motor, FTM focusing, metal barrel, non-rotating front element, constant aperture, etc. Then again, many non-Ls also have these features. One thing for sure, none of the EF-S lenses are Ls.

It's true, but many here who own and owned the EF-S 10-22 said this lens is like a hidden L.

 

[Kiwira]

It's true, but many here who own and owned the EF-S 10-22 said this lens is like a hidden L.

same goes for 17 55, its even better than the 24 70 imo if it wasnt for the efs >_>

stabilizer's own it

 

[Jazzmint90]

i see. ya IS is a bonus plus point for any lens. its like a must have feature.

 

[Snoweagle]

same goes for 17 55, its even better than the 24 70 imo if it wasnt for the efs >_>

stabilizer's own it

i see. ya IS is a bonus plus point for any lens. its like a must have feature.

IS gd to have but not a must-have. I do not own any IS lens as i don't need it, somemore can save me a lot more money.

 

[raydio]

Well, let me start a new topic for this thread.

i am hoping to get my first L lens this year. hope you guys would share with me whats the difference b/w L lens and EF lens? or all of your experiences with L lens on your 5D! Does it mean EF do not produce better IQ then L lens( although i think this is not true ) ?

have heard that the "upgrade" to L lens is definitely worth the money, but i am not exactly sure whats the different. except i know because of its amazing IQ, solid build, and of course the good reviews bout them!

Thanks!

Good question! I think that the responses you get will be highly subjective... mine is no different.

I have a few L's, namely the 17-40L, 70-200L and the 100-400L. I also have several "regular" non-L lenses. For me, the biggest (subjective) difference is with colour, contrast and bokeh. Lenses with an "L" designation just seem to do them better!.... better colour, better contrast and better bokeh.

There are times when I've taken a photo on the spur of the moment without any high expectations and the L lens just seems to render them spectacularly! I can't explain it but I'm reminded of the old saying, "You get what you pay for." I guess there's a reason why these lens have been designated, "L".

 

[zurichdo]

same goes for 17 55, its even better than the 24 70 imo if it wasnt for the efs >_>

stabilizer's own it

Pretty much agree on the 17-55 here. However, I sold it off after using for a few months as I am really disappointed with the build. I strongly recommend a filter once it leaves it's original packaging. My friend has a copy that has a big piece of dust inside the lens element, which looks like lizard droppings, if you get what I mean. It was really disgusting and it was only used for less than half a year 1st hand.

I personally find it to be over priced, and switched to the 24-105. IMO, the IQ is on par and the L contrast and colour is slightly better, yet it can be bought at price lower than the 17-55. This is really a good joke from canon, to price a short zoom range lens at such a high price, without the seals and feel of the L.

So is an L lens really better? I believe if a professional photographer is given an L and a non-L and told to picture the same subject matter at same FL, lighting and aperture, the L will almost always stand out

 

[zurichdo]

Good question! I think that the responses you get will be highly subjective... mine is no different.

I have a few L's, namely the 17-40L, 70-200L and the 100-400L. I also have several "regular" non-L lenses. For me, the biggest (subjective) difference is with colour, contrast and bokeh. Lenses with an "L" designation just seem to do them better!.... better colour, better contrast and better bokeh.

There are times when I've taken a photo on the spur of the moment without any high expectations and the L lens just seems to render them spectacularly! I can't explain it but I'm reminded of the old saying, "You get what you pay for." I guess there's a reason why these lens have been designated, "L".

:thumbsup:

Though personally, I try to refrain from buying L, unless I am super poisoned, just like the 135L ;p

 

[raydio]

:thumbsup:

Though personally, I try to refrain from buying L, unless I am super poisoned, just like the 135L ;p

Amen to that!

 

[herbiee]

hello guys, i just bought a 2nd hand 5d. just to ask, does csc singapore service foreign bought equipment (not under warranty)? cuz mine is a japan set.

 

[Yoh]

hello guys, i just bought a 2nd hand 5d. just to ask, does csc singapore service foreign bought equipment (not under warranty)? cuz mine is a japan set.

As long as you pay for the relevant service charges, there shouldn't be a reason why CSC Singapore would reject it.

 

[raydio]

hello guys, i just bought a 2nd hand 5d. just to ask, does csc singapore service foreign bought equipment (not under warranty)? cuz mine is a japan set.

Yes they will service your foreign bought equipment. CSC Singapore has serviced my Hong Kong purchased lenses. CSC Canada has serviced my Singapore purchased 5D. It doesn't matter where in the world you take your equipment, the local Canon Service Centre is able and willing to service it.

 

[herbiee]

Yes they will service your foreign bought equipment. CSC Singapore has serviced my Hong Kong purchased lenses. CSC Canada has serviced my Singapore purchased 5D. It doesn't matter where in the world you take your equipment, the local Canon Service Centre is able and willing to service it.

glad to hear that. thanks!

 

[Jazzmint90]

haha maybe i should start a new thread on this question. and i will see people debating about this! thanks guys. but still, i am going to get my first L lens this year, to try it out. although its gona burn a hole in my pocket!!

 

[Jazzmint90]

Good question! I think that the responses you get will be highly subjective... mine is no different.

I have a few L's, namely the 17-40L, 70-200L and the 100-400L. I also have several "regular" non-L lenses. For me, the biggest (subjective) difference is with colour, contrast and bokeh. Lenses with an "L" designation just seem to do them better!.... better colour, better contrast and better bokeh.

There are times when I've taken a photo on the spur of the moment without any high expectations and the L lens just seems to render them spectacularly! I can't explain it but I'm reminded of the old saying, "You get what you pay for." I guess there's a reason why these lens have been designated, "L".

:thumbsup::thumbsup: yes we get what we pay for, but doesnt mean a expensive gear will out perform no-L lens.

Actually to think of it. Photography is not to own all the expensive gear, but to make use of your existing gear to take amazing pictures.

 

[Jazzmint90]

IS gd to have but not a must-have. I do not own any IS lens as i don't need it, somemore can save me a lot more money.

ya if we dun include IS can save maybe up to $300-400

 

[raydio]

haha maybe i should start a new thread on this question. and i will see people debating about this! thanks guys. but still, i am going to get my first L lens this year, to try it out. although its gona burn a hole in my pocket!!

You will be like many of us who aimlessly walk through the streets with air conditioned pockets!

 

[Jazzmint90]

You will be like many of us who aimlessly walk through the streets with air conditioned pockets!

just curious, anyone of your is a free lance photographer?

 

[Snoweagle]

haha maybe i should start a new thread on this question. and i will see people debating about this! thanks guys. but still, i am going to get my first L lens this year, to try it out. although its gona burn a hole in my pocket!!

Dun have to buy an L lens to burn a hole in yr pocket. Even buying a FF DSLR will also have the same effect!