[Numnumball] Urbanscapes/Ruralscapes in SG


Sry for seeing this late bro.. Thanks :)

Yup.. Agreed. or i can simply correct the distortin and lose some pixels the easy way.. lol..

Wah, u can see dust.. :bigeyes: my sensor needs cleaning soon le ...

is not dust, is buoy, looks like dust (but is not, just looks like). :sweat:
 

148.

5280096499_839b520020_b.jpg
 

Last edited:
Have been look at #148 for some time.

Felt that it is "inbalanced" in a way, the rock ( the part above the water and its "base" in the water) is already occupying half the photo.

This is how I feel, would like to hear your views too. :)
 

is not dust, is buoy, looks like dust (but is not, just looks like). :sweat:

LOL.. ok.. but spot a few specks on my other photos (nt on the same spot though), still need cleaning.. :bsmilie:
 

Have been look at #148 for some time.

Felt that it is "inbalanced" in a way, the rock ( the part above the water and its "base" in the water) is already occupying half the photo.

This is how I feel, would like to hear your views too. :)

Hay Clement,

Tks for popping by..

Becos its one massive rock~!!! The tide today is not so high. and rocks ard me at the time when its gg to rain are mostly big rocks.. (was at knee level water deep for this shot).. if go towards the shore.. Its either too clustered and too messy.. !st thought that strcuk me is i wan to present this frame with most emphasis on the rock itself, showcasing its beauty.. And dun wan to give an impression to crop away any part (major) of the rock abruptly.. so thought of inlcuding a larger portion (the while rock in fact) into the frame and do a 50% FG, 25 % MG and 25% BG split with the rocks size and details drawing viewers attention most and leading them upwards and down again.. :)
 

Maybe I more conservative, hence find it sort of heavy at the bottom.

Thanks Bryan for taking time to share your insights. :)
 

Back
Top