#117
![]()
#120
Let the Light Enter
![]()
Hi Kit, thanks for pointing out. Yes I was aware of the barrel distortion from the 17-40. Especially the initial effort for #117 was very severe and it was the first time I encountered the effect of the distortion so severe that the buildings curved in. After some PP, the distortion is not as severe as initially, but still quite bad. I recomposed many times to try to minimalise the effects but it is still very pronounced. #118 had the same problem but I cropped away the section with the curved verticals of the near building.
I recall you mentioned somewhere about careful alignment and composing can minimalise the effects of such inherent distortion. The distortion effect is so pronounced because the plane of the buildings are not parallel with the sensor plane? If thats so, there is no way I could take #117 without such pronounced effects isn't it (assuming I want to include the two blocks of hdb on the left and right side of the frame in #117)?
#130
Stretched
Of the many ways I've seen to present the ceiling of Millenia Walk, I dare say I have only seen it being presented in a way that emphasises symmetry. These framing are symmetrical if you do not nitpick small elements within the frame. I was walking around with my heads up (in the process, many people also look up wondering what is this lunatic looking at) and searching for ways to present the ceiling.
If the design implies symmetry, it is difficult to jump out of the thinking, and as I mentioned, I feel that symmetry helps to lock in elements preventing them from appearing scattered. In this case, I felt my thinking is being locked. Every time I tried looking elsewhere and re-look at the ceiling in hope for fresh ideas, I find myself seeing it in a symmetrical sense. The way I had chosen to frame the ceiling, is also a departure from the rigid way I present structures.
The conceptualising of this shot began from the four pairs of pillars. I did also want to avoid presenting it in a typical geometrical figure manner, in a sense if you look at it in this orientation, I could have chosen to align it in a way that it looks like a kite with the longer diagonal across the kite being aligned horizontally. The diagonal of the kite is aligned at a small angle to the diagonal of the frame. This is to prevent the two pairs of pillars at the bottom right and top left corner to be placed at the corners of the frame, yet still retain the idea of the kite (colourful roof) being stretched by these pillars.
![]()
Hi, thanks! Glad it works for you.
I'm sorry i cant recall the exact workflow. I remember I reduced the highlights slightly. Normally I will adjust this in RAW then if necessary do adjustment in shadow/midtone/highlight. Unless necessary, if not I try not to bring out details in shadows. In this case, I think I had opened up the RAW in photoshop and under the second section call tonal adjustment (highlight, light, dark, shadow), I reduced the highlights and as you reduce it gradually using the slider, you will see the change and transition of the "glare", so I reduced till I felt comfortable with the transition. Hope that helps!![]()
Hi, I think the diagonal comp is a nice try here as an alternative take on the usual straight lines comp - though I would still try my best to maximize the "symmetry" (of course sometimes it's easier said than done - here you can try to crop more of the bottom). You can also try to vignette (perhaps selectively) to draw the attention away from the unavoidable distractions. Just a few suggestions, cheers!#130
Stretched