Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8 or Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8 or Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8.......900g compare to prime lens is heavy but compare to our sar21, this is nothing. lol. this is a pro lens, one of the best zoom lens optically.
Can not compare like that:nono:, we are given no choice with the SAR21, in the army how to choose:cry:? Personally for me, once I have experience the joy of travelling light with Prime Lens, I find it hard to travel with heavy lens again especially if the image quality is not sacrificed.
However I still have mine zoom for those less labourious trips.
Second that, I just return from a trip to China, Xian. The 50mm f1.4D is the only lens that I bring along. It works beautifully especially in the dim display hall of the Terracotta Museum:thumbsup::thumbsup:
You only brought one lens for your trip ! :bigeyes: :thumbsup:
Sold my 14-24 to numnumball n got me d 16-35. Feeling immediate relief to my neck. Now it reads like 16-35, 28-300, 50/1.4... Quite complete i guess. Now its time to take them for a shootout! BTW, nice to meet up w you Bro numnumball!
Just got back from a trip to Tokyo... 3/4 of the time the 24 f1.4 was used, followed by the 17-35 f2.8 as my walk about lens. It is more than enough in my opinion to cover various lighting conditions. If you ask me to choose one, it will be the 24 f1.4.
me will likely hoot the new 24-120 F4 VRII as my next travelling len
Yeah... Tks man... Nice knowing u too
And I m loving the insane view of this 14-24..
It compliment the 16-35 really well...
For me now will be 14-24, 50 1.2 and 135 DC for general walk abt
14-24 is a very sweet uwa lens. Good for you having it !
IMHO, between 50mm and 135mm there is quite focal length difference. Need a new lens to fill the gap.![]()