I forgot to mention that I use a monopod with a ball-head.
.......... and the VRII was OFF.
Did u use Manual settings?
Cos under P settings, my shutter speed can never get 1/125 inside that place?
Thanks
you see it as $$ for a lens.
I see it as $$ for a special point of view of the world .......
![]()
Shot was taken with the following rig and setup:
Distance to subject 290m
1 Taken using a tripod
2 VRII On - tripod mode
3 Mirror delay
4 Cable release
5 TC-20 2xConverter
6 Image Size reduced from 300 > 100 DPI for this post
Make Nikon
Model Nikon D3S
Lens nikkor 400mm f2.8 VRII
Flash Used No
Focal Length 800 mm
Exposure Time 1/180 sec
Aperture f/5.6
ISO Equivalent 5000
Exposure Bias -
White Balance Auto
Metering Mode matrix (5)
Exposure Program manual (1)
enjoy ...... pygmy
I don't know if I have seen you said so anywhere here but is there any noise reduction dialed in during the exposure or on the post processing when converting the NEF to jpeg?
My D3s produced clean looking photos at 6400 with noticeable noise especially in the shadows and at 12800 it is rather grainy. If I want to compare in relation to other cameras like the D700 and D300 I would say the D3s at high ISO to be very clean, but in itself I would say it is still grainy, definitely not as smooth as all the photos I have seen you posted here.
Did I set something different in my camera? My noise reduction was set to low because I did not want to loose more details to NR.
Surprisingly, the noise in this photo (shadow below the fence at the bottom) at ISO 5000 is a lot more than the first owl shot at 12400.
Or, it's just me?
I don't think it makes sense to analyse noise at this size of image. Too small.
Can pygmy provide 100% crops of 2 or 3 strategic areas , eg, the area behind the yellow van or the top right corner?
i was stunned that i could discern the individual LEDs in the traffic light considering this image was made from approx 290m away (measured on google earth).
That's also because you got a tokkong lens!![]()
Yes you are right. I mean noisy but am too used to the term grainy since film days so I sort of stick to it.Conversion from NEF > Jpeg was done by opening the NEF in Photoshop CS4 Camera Raw with NO adjustments and saving it as Jpeg at highest quality.
the in-camera High ISO NR was set HIGH.
Regarding ".......12800 it is rather grainy".
I am not sure if you mean "grainy" to mean "noisy". I have only heard of the tern "grain" used on film and not digital negatives. We can discuss the taxonomy in a different thread.
To answer your question I will assume you mean "noise". I have a feeling this is due to over exposure.
"Did I set something different in my camera?" ....... i would be very surprised if your camera settings are exactly the same as mine.
What lens were you using?
cheers!