Nikon D3200 or D7000
- Thread starter ptwong
- Start date
spree86
Senior Member
kandinsky said:
Hmm I feel that the learning curve would be the same if we are talking about photography basics. Operations wise, actually it's simpler to operate a D7000 due to the dedicated buttons and the user do not need to search through the menu to change certain settings.
Luminare
Senior Member
I would say that the D3200 and D7000 are very different cameras.
So it very much depends on what is the intent of use for the next 2 to 3 years.
If the hubby likes photography and doesnt mind picking up all the aperture setting techniques and other photograhpy stuff, as well as lens changing and having to carry a camera bag around and having to invest in lens in the future, D7000 is a good gift.
But if the intention is not the above, then dont get a DSLR, get a mirrorless camera as it is much smaller, good for travels and very convinent to carry around. Fashionable too.
i would personally feel that if one would to spend a thousand plus on a DSLR but have no intention to use it beyond the preset modes or change lens, then it defeats the purpose of getting DSLR as the mirrorless systems are more cost effective purchases and have a fashion accessory element to it, not to mention for hassle free to carry in a small case/pouch.
So it very much depends on what is the intent of use for the next 2 to 3 years.
If the hubby likes photography and doesnt mind picking up all the aperture setting techniques and other photograhpy stuff, as well as lens changing and having to carry a camera bag around and having to invest in lens in the future, D7000 is a good gift.
But if the intention is not the above, then dont get a DSLR, get a mirrorless camera as it is much smaller, good for travels and very convinent to carry around. Fashionable too.
i would personally feel that if one would to spend a thousand plus on a DSLR but have no intention to use it beyond the preset modes or change lens, then it defeats the purpose of getting DSLR as the mirrorless systems are more cost effective purchases and have a fashion accessory element to it, not to mention for hassle free to carry in a small case/pouch.
photoart
Senior Member
I agree with this. I have a Olympus epl1 as a casual camera. The shutter and aperture settings are not on the camera body itself, I have to go into the menu to set it. Sometimes I get confused with the menu buttons and ended up using auto mode( sometimes with unsatisfactory results)
nikoneer
Member
Been there done that...
I had 2 cameras, entry level and mid entry level.
then I have now the semi pro cam d7k
I'm eyeing on a professional cam now d800
see the two waste and mistakes that I did?
d7k can also perform as a learning for entry level. those 2: entry level and mid entry level cams is such a waste.
go directly to d7k ts.
the sensor size will only do a few benefits compared to d7k's versatility. 16 mp is more than enough for casual and artistic shots.
I had 2 cameras, entry level and mid entry level.
then I have now the semi pro cam d7k
I'm eyeing on a professional cam now d800
see the two waste and mistakes that I did?
d7k can also perform as a learning for entry level. those 2: entry level and mid entry level cams is such a waste.
go directly to d7k ts.
the sensor size will only do a few benefits compared to d7k's versatility. 16 mp is more than enough for casual and artistic shots.
Last edited:
rain5533
Senior Member
D3200 or D5100 & D7000.
Everything is just depend what you need to buy for?
You wanna enjoy the new feature of technology or you just grab on simple cam like firm base is nothing to allow you to setting more than what you want..
Just bring up the cam and remove the lens cover with switch on power and after adjust with setting and continue shoot for what you like...
That's what my opinion
Everything is just depend what you need to buy for?
You wanna enjoy the new feature of technology or you just grab on simple cam like firm base is nothing to allow you to setting more than what you want..
Just bring up the cam and remove the lens cover with switch on power and after adjust with setting and continue shoot for what you like...
That's what my opinion
Luminare
Senior Member
I would agree to the above although i would personally prefer the D5100 to the D3200 after having use both cameras to take photographs for tourist when i am out doing cityscape photograhpy.
Dont really suggest going for the D7000 unless it is a form of an upgrade from an existing camera and with no further intentions to go into 100% manual setting FX cameras like the D600, D700 etc etc.
To me, a good lens with a moderate entry level body is a better buy for any guy who just picked up photography as better picture quality starts with better quality lens. As it is, lens can last 10 years and good quality lens can fetch good resale value. Cant say the same for none Professional bodies.
Just a suggestion, if your friend is thinking of a Budget of D7000 + (18-105mm) kit lens that is going cost about 2,100, why not consider a D5100 Body + 18-200mm VR II that adds up to be about the same price.
fmeeran
New Member
ptwong said:
+1 if you don't mind second hand.
For a gift, i would suggest D7000 if you think he's likely to get into photography, and D3200 if he's more likely to shoot auto mode.
The D3200 has some advantages over the D7000. The most important of which is price. ;-) But having more buttons and dials makes a huge difference.
My 2c. Please take with 2c worth of salt.
Similar threads
