nikon 28mm f1.8
- Thread starter bigfatlamer
- Start date
Just used the Sigma 24/1.8 on a shoot a couple days back... it has been a while since I took it out for work... amazing results!! Just reminded me why I still keep the lens. Never fail to amaze me everytime I use it!!
Wow.. did not notice it until you said it.. looks as if the head is just paste on.. no offense intended..
Why not tiger!! Give the man a tiger!!
Cheesecake
Senior Member
he is asking u why u din't shoot the fotos with a can of tiger instead la.
Carlsberg... hmm.. the onl Carlsberg I like is the special brew!
Don't worried brother. We knew you like your sigma 24mm f1.8 since you own an keep it.
But for the new user haven't got the set an now got it amazing price with IQ why not try on 28mm f1.8G with nano coating lens.
At lease pay for worth
If someone offer me a new 28/1.8G in exchange for my old and used sigma 24/1.8... I wouldn't trade. ;P
A sample from the sigma 24...
GReddyZC76
New Member
sir. to each its own.
one man's meat is another man's poison.
well, same here, if any1 offer me a new sigma or trade with the nikkor, same here, i wouldnt trade. I would say I rather not shoot, than to use Sigma lenses.
ok no offences to sigma's lenses owners.
one man's meat is another man's poison.
well, same here, if any1 offer me a new sigma or trade with the nikkor, same here, i wouldnt trade. I would say I rather not shoot, than to use Sigma lenses.
ok no offences to sigma's lenses owners.
If someone offer me a new 28/1.8G in exchange for my old and used sigma 24/1.8... I wouldn't trade. ;P
A sample from the sigma 24...
Blur Shadow
Senior Member
GReddyZC76 said:well, same here, if any1 offer me a new sigma or trade with the nikkor, same here, i wouldnt trade. I would say I rather not shoot, than to use Sigma lenses.
ok no offences to sigma's lenses owners.
Don't like this leh bro. I actually have an equal number of Nikon and Sigma lenses!!
rain5533
Senior Member
wolfton said:Wow that statement is very strong.
Anyway I think you are missing out on some really cheap and good performers.
How can be called cheap??
Because you not buying food..
Value for money lah.. for that priced and get double performance and still got extra cash for buy others lenese.
BTW don't think it is cheap or value price, the overall you can get the D3200 with Kit ha ha
Last edited:
Cheesecake
Senior Member
erm, ok.
rain5533
Senior Member
wolfton said:Paiseh bro, my England is just pass nia
You r right, value for money is the phrase..
Ha ha don't worried..
BTW in future we need you to input and taken more nice photos from this lens.
Look like me at limited for reviews of the lens.
Some new info may need you guy to update
The overall conclusion :
Best to have it copy an no regretted at all
Now my D800 only mount with 28mm f1.8G at 100%...
GReddyZC76
New Member
Okie Ok.
Disclaimers, i have nothing against any one &/or any third party lenses.
It like more of a personal preferences.
I owned a Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 Di II; Yes it 'cheaper' if compare to Nikkor 17-55 F/2.8, or rather, i consider the tamron a affordable and value-for-$ walk-around constant F zoom DX lens. I also own a Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX, great value lens too.
Except sigma, which I had numerously heard of the QC issues.
Anyway off-topic...
I'm awaiting patiently for the 28mm F/1.8G, hopefully it will works fine with my D300S...
BTW i saw in BNS , an legend classic, AF 24mm F/1.4D
(ref:http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2814af.htm)
Disclaimers, i have nothing against any one &/or any third party lenses.
It like more of a personal preferences.
I owned a Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 Di II; Yes it 'cheaper' if compare to Nikkor 17-55 F/2.8, or rather, i consider the tamron a affordable and value-for-$ walk-around constant F zoom DX lens. I also own a Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX, great value lens too.
Except sigma, which I had numerously heard of the QC issues.
Anyway off-topic...
I'm awaiting patiently for the 28mm F/1.8G, hopefully it will works fine with my D300S...
BTW i saw in BNS , an legend classic, AF 24mm F/1.4D
(ref:http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2814af.htm)
Wow that statement is very strong.
Anyway I think you are missing out on some really cheap and good performers.
Last edited:
rain5533
Senior Member
GReddyZC76 said:Okie Ok.
Disclaimers, i have nothing against any one &/or any third party lenses.
It like more of a personal preferences.
I owned a Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 Di II; Yes it 'cheaper' if compare to Nikkor 17-55 F/2.8, or rather, i consider the tamron a affordable and value-for-$ walk-around constant F zoom DX lens. I also own a Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX, great value lens too.
Except sigma, which I had numerously heard of the QC issues.
Anyway off-topic...
I'm awaiting patiently for the 28mm F/1.8G, hopefully it will works fine with my D300S...
BTW i saw in BNS , an legend classic, AF 24mm F/1.4D
(ref:http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2814af.htm)
Ya.. Recently just notice in B&S got this selling is throw out their love collector lens 28mm f1.4D ha ha...
What happening to be find up the answer...
A little got some impact of this lens after announcement
rain5533 said:Ha ha don't worried..
BTW in future we need you to input and taken more nice photos from this lens.
Look like me at limited for reviews of the lens.
Some new info may need you guy to update
The overall conclusion :
Best to have it copy an no regretted at all
Now my D800 only mount with 28mm f1.8G at 100%...
Sure bro, no luck in getting it yet. Maybe I will go Angsana walk one round next week, see if I can get a copy there.
Similar threads
