I beg people not to buy it
i think my old c5050 writes and focus faster then it
Lovells19
Skills, or the lack of it, makes a photo nice or not so nice. All point and shoot cameras are about the same.
(a) Here's the link to someone whose wreck diving photos
made it into Scuba Diver Australasia using a SP-350. Not his 1st time using a SP-350 and shoot himself into magazines.
http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/un...s-made-into-scuba-diver-australasia-woot.html
(b) Here's the link where people takes more than decent quality photos using the "dun buy" SP 350camera. The forummers there bitched abt the slow focus speed and other ills but they still captured fish portraits pretty decently.
http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/olympus-outlet/249525-olympus-350-images-impressions.html
Look for the photo of a grasshopper in Post 2 by Larry C. Grasshoppers are skittish bugs if u get too close, dun they? Surely the AF focus fast enough to capture that pic
How abt the last photo of a shrimp in Post 6 by ce4jesus?
Do shrimps remain motionless and posed for divers all the time?
Photos in Post 11 by Tassie Rohan are fantastic given that he use a "dun buy' camera as quoted from you.
(c) Yo can view Larry C photos using SP350 under the link
http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h240/Larry_C/
there are quite a few fish portraits in his album. And fishes DUN stay motionless and pose for u right?
Please dun use sweeping statements for comparing C5050 to SP350. We need to inform newcomers rightly and without prejudice. The poor threadstarter is probably confused. We all know that C5050 is an excellent prosumer cam that Olympus unfortunately doesn't make anymore of these in their new lineup. SP-350 is not a prosumer cam, at best a mid level point and shoot when it debuted in 2006. How abt compare the glass used by C5050 against the latest point and shoot cams? Which
current point and shoot camera uses f1.8 glass like the C5050? Which
current point and shoot has smaller aperture than F8 currently? The size of sensor on the C5050 is bigger than most point and shoot cams of today.
I'm a weekend warrior who enjoys kicking around or shooting hoops with friends. I have the old Adidas predator model (2005) and Nike T-Mac basketball shoes. Heck, I still can't bend the ball like Beckham, dribble like Zidane, and the only part that closely ressembles Tracy Macgrady is my Nike shoes that he wears. I admit that I dun have their skills and will never reach their levels in 10 generations. End of day, it's the skills and the way to work around problems to make things work despite their shortcomings.
U have used the D200 to make nice photos and it's an excellent cam. I am using C7070, D80, D300 and I still can't get my photos into mags or win contests unlike Ivan (
www.divenet.net) nor Alvin Ho. And Alvin uses a Oly E-510 which in
www.dpreview.com does not enjoys rave reviews like D300! It's because they are good at what they do, not because Alvin uses E-510 or Ivan uses E-500. Maybe I shld buy a 2nd hand E-510 for uw shooting to get into magazine pages.:think: BTW have you seen Edman's (
www.edvineng.com) photos using point and shoot cameras with OEM housings? Many of his shoots are as good as, if not better than those from DSLR. How did a camera like G9/10 with AF focus slowly, not as good as its bigger and better cousins shoot such pics? Surely it's the approach and Edvin's level of proficiency. Check out
www.wetpixel.com abt forummers comments on his shoots.
I have no quarrels against u, Lovells19. Probably you have a terrible experience with SP350 after fiddling with it for a while, but the objectives in our statements must be correct.
Based on threadstarter low initial uw shooting experience, small budget for camera + uw housing, urgent need to get a cam deadline and the current available setups for 2nd hand sale locally, what do you suggest for him? Perhaps you have a better lobang for 2nd hand stuff than most of us.
It's easy to say Brand A sucks, Brand B sucks, Johnblue's (me!) uw shooting skills sucks, but let's provide alternatives, solutions so that everyone benefits from asking.
Do let threadstarter know which setups you have in mind that can fit his budget and its availability here. I believe many of the newcomers would love to know.
PS: By informing that 'camera plays a small part, ultimately its the photoshop', we are not telling the newcomers the correct thing. Ultimately, a well exposed and a good eye for composition photo taken the 1st time is beneficial to them in the long run than using photoshop to adjust color curves, creating/editing layers and cropping. Photoshop is not the right tool to produce good photos, it's a mean to enhance photos.