Oh. Sorry, I was referring to 17-50 Sigma or Tamron.. PS.. Maybe i will just get a non-IS version first then save up another 2k+ to upgrade to the IS version..
Better idea than buying and selling the 18-135. The L should hold it's value much better.
Oh. Sorry, I was referring to 17-50 Sigma or Tamron.. PS.. Maybe i will just get a non-IS version first then save up another 2k+ to upgrade to the IS version..
Ah... The 17-55 f2.8 and 70-200 f2.8... Beautiful...
And damn poisonous!
Sold my 17-55 in anticipation for FF... And I also kinda chose the 24-105 over it due to the longer reach... More useful as a walkabout... But the 17-55 was missed from time to time...
Just a reminder.If you buy from dd electronics which offers lower price but you have to notice that that lens is grey set and it has risk to a certain extent.Just my 2c
Since you have the 55-250, why do you need the 70-200 ?
Tripods, get the fancier 6662A for around $68 ( Tago Tech)
I would suggest that you head straight for the f2.8 glass and skip the 18-135
Just my two cents, but i would do that if i were you.
yes, i agree with you here... you can consider a tamron or sigma 17-50... if you can afford it, get the sigma's version...
Ok. I will get that lens online from HK.. Can save $$ from there.
Ok la.. I think i have made up my mind! I will get Sigma 30 f/1.4 first, then 17-50 and finally 70-200 f/2.8 IS.. but i think i will also get a Nissin Di866 in between..