ok I deleted my earlier posts to student.
nothing good comes out from an argument with someone who seems to get a kick out of being contrary for the sake of being contrary
You mean to say that if I do not see a point in this image, I am "being contrary for the sake of being contrary"? Come on. Surely you are "bigger" than that!! Surely you can accept contrary opinion? No? Or must everybody agree with you? Well, I am not the only one. Kho King asked "what is the point of the shot?". Is Kho King also being contrary for the sake of contrary?
mattlock said:If anyone is interested in what point there is in my work, consider why you were so amused by the photo, and look at the rest of my photos on my website.
I see, you had earlier said "if you think everything needs to start out with a point to make a point, take a look at andy warhol to debunk that myth".
And now you are saying that because people find this image amusing, there is a "point" to it? And also to the rest of your work? Now people cannot just enjoy the amusement as it stands, but must now dig deeper into the psyche to analyse why they find this image amusing? Wow! Are you not making this too damn serious?
Relax man! Do not take yourself too damn seriously! Your "obsession" may be getting to you.