Kermitfm
Member
Corporates are certainly not wimps. They have dozens of special programs and in house developed applications which their business depends on and an incompatibility issue could cost $$$. Vista was developed with security on the top of the priority list as XP was weak in this area. However, it became very cumbersome and resource hungry and the security features introduce incompatibility issues.
MS hopes that Windows 7 will be better. I hope so too. From a home user point of view, I think that MS should revamp the code to make it lighter and more secure and then introduce low cost or zero cost alternatives to the office suite - which may need to be replaced. If they do this, I will move back from Mac OSX. However I think this is a dream because the real money is in the corporate users and they will require (demand?) that the OS be backwark compatible to XP, W2K etc. There lies the dilemma of Microsoft. Good luck all.....
MS hopes that Windows 7 will be better. I hope so too. From a home user point of view, I think that MS should revamp the code to make it lighter and more secure and then introduce low cost or zero cost alternatives to the office suite - which may need to be replaced. If they do this, I will move back from Mac OSX. However I think this is a dream because the real money is in the corporate users and they will require (demand?) that the OS be backwark compatible to XP, W2K etc. There lies the dilemma of Microsoft. Good luck all.....