Danntbt said:
Give the local publication a chance to improve....overhead is high here, but I feel John and company are trying...without support, the quality will go down further, its a vicious cycle, perhaps feedback and suggestions might help them deliver better stuff.
Initially was quite happy that PhotoVideoI gets better and decided to include a lot of local contents updates. I know they need money to get in circulation, thus supported with subscription.
However, as the months goes, it is starting to turn into an advertisment tabloid. The reviews of new gadgets are so obviously 'sponsor oriented'. Who gives money for advert, then write good good for the things. You don't really get critical comments on the downs, but exagerrated praises.
Also, John is quite pro Canon, although using D100 himself. (Tot he got himself D200 already?)
This spells bad for a magazine to start taking camps. Will aggravate either camps.
If you ask me, will stop subscription once mine ends. Unless they start to really put some work into the articles. Because it starts to diminish my mind when I read it.
Weekh, you are right that it is really getting superficial and the pool of contributors are getting stale.
John or Joe or whoever elses in the team sees this, please buck up!
