Speedwagon
Member
wong_se said:chelsea can offer 32M not becos only they can afford, because Gerrard wortht that price tag. if money is not issue to chelsea..why not chelsea offer 100m for gerrard. if 100m is made an offer and gerrard weekly wage is 1M...i dun think Gerrard will be Liverpool player any more.
Why we never see MU or arsenal make on offer ? because MU has a budget only at 25. They can;t folk out 32m. Not to mention arsenal who even has a smaller budget limit..When u have $150 , u dun walk in to CP to ask for f2.8 lens.
I dun support Liverpool pay 40m for him...I only support Liverpool to offer him a 4 year contract...that would eventuall pay him around 20m after his 4 year service with us.
All this transfer fee had been going out of control. The bubbles will burst sometime......Zidane cost 45.8M and Figo 37.5M. So you think SG is the same class as Zidane and Figo?? SG not even the EPOY.
I didnt say SG is no good, just saying for 40M is really too high for his class.
For you he may worth 40M in Liverpool, it is bcos of his passion with Liverpool...but I will doubt he will have the same passion if he's playing for other clubs...so with his class.....not worth 40M.