Hi Tomcat,
Thanks for all the useful advice and suggestions given. Appreciate your time and thoughts on the 2 choices of compacts.
I'll weigh my needs and decide if I am willing to sacrifice IQ for convenience and speed. Your comments on the process you use for the Sigma on RAW only rather than JPEG would make me consider the Leica more seriously. However if the Sigma's Pro Photo RAW converter you refer to does the job painlessly then I might opt for that.
The speed issue is always referred to in reviews where the DP-1 is concerned and that is of course one of my main apprehensions - but as can be seen from your pics - IQ is outstanding! (as summed up in your last few sentences)
Portraits aren't really so important for my needs at the moment. Loved having the 85mm from Nikon but I think I'm past the hobby phase of photography as my skill level is pretty basic and my passion for carrying equipment has kinda died. The street scenes and travel photography is what I am really looking for - having said that coming from having so many dslrs in the past IQ is hard to give up.
I've also looked at Jim Radcliffe's site and his comments on using Adobe Photoshop for PP rather than relying on the camera's algorithms - however not all of us have his talent for this or his time. http://www.boxedlight.com/dlux4/
For others who may be interested this link also has pics from the earlier D-Lux 3 and the Sigma I am considering.
By the way I really enjoyed your shot of the Marina Barrage from your D700 and Sigma fisheye http://www.pbase.com/pschia/image/107380505
WELL DONE!
joe
Thanks for all the useful advice and suggestions given. Appreciate your time and thoughts on the 2 choices of compacts.
I'll weigh my needs and decide if I am willing to sacrifice IQ for convenience and speed. Your comments on the process you use for the Sigma on RAW only rather than JPEG would make me consider the Leica more seriously. However if the Sigma's Pro Photo RAW converter you refer to does the job painlessly then I might opt for that.
The speed issue is always referred to in reviews where the DP-1 is concerned and that is of course one of my main apprehensions - but as can be seen from your pics - IQ is outstanding! (as summed up in your last few sentences)
Portraits aren't really so important for my needs at the moment. Loved having the 85mm from Nikon but I think I'm past the hobby phase of photography as my skill level is pretty basic and my passion for carrying equipment has kinda died. The street scenes and travel photography is what I am really looking for - having said that coming from having so many dslrs in the past IQ is hard to give up.
I've also looked at Jim Radcliffe's site and his comments on using Adobe Photoshop for PP rather than relying on the camera's algorithms - however not all of us have his talent for this or his time. http://www.boxedlight.com/dlux4/
For others who may be interested this link also has pics from the earlier D-Lux 3 and the Sigma I am considering.
By the way I really enjoyed your shot of the Marina Barrage from your D700 and Sigma fisheye http://www.pbase.com/pschia/image/107380505
WELL DONE!
joe
I always shoot in RAW, so all these shots were taken in RAW and converted using the proprietory conversion software provided with the respective cameras. The 2 images are taken within seconds of each other. The difference in tonality is inherent in the sensor output and raw processing algorithm used.
In any case, the Sigma DP1 as with all Sigma DSLRs with Foveon sensors, is not that good taking jpeg out-of-camera. The best image quality is obtained by shooting RAW and converting using Sigma Photo Pro. The D-Lux 4 (and LX3) on the other hand seems to be designed for jpeg shooting and would require more post processing work if used in RAW mode.
Whether DP1 or DP2 is more suitable for you would depend on what you want to shoot. Both are actually more suitable for landscape and street photography and can't really be used for close-up portrait photographybecause of the wide angle perspective distortion effect. DP2 would better for landscape and worse for portrait in this sense.
You should be aware that the DP1 is rather slow and hesitant in AF especially if lighting level is low compared to DSLRs, especially fast ones like your D300. You may have trouble adapting to this initially if at all. According to my dealer, the sale of DP1 and Ricoh P&S cameras have dropped to rock bottom after the launch of the LX3, so it should be available at much lower price now than when I first bought mine. But if image quality in a compact camera is of paramount importance to you, there is really not much choice. The DP1 and the forthcoming DP2 is light years better than any compact P&S in existence at the moment.