Lack of privacy in photo competition

[redstone]

hm....i stumbled across this. it belongs to the MDA act chapter 172. dunno what this really means, but thought it will be nice to share it anyway:


Preservation of secrecy
59. —(1) Except for the purpose of the performance of his duties or the exercise of his functions or when lawfully required to do so by any court or under the provisions of any written law, no person who is or has
been —

(a) a member, an officer, an employee, an agent or a consultant of the Authority; or

(b) a member of a committee of the Authority,

shall disclose any information relating to the affairs of the Authority or of any other person which has been obtained by him in the performance of his duties or the exercise of his functions.

(2) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.

Hmm... I don't think this relates to the issue of protection of personal details? :think: :dunno: Not too sure... I think is like keeping secrets of the organisation you'e part of? :dunno:

 

[redstone]

Hope something to be done.

 

[+evenstar]

dun be like NATO..No Action Talk Only...you want to complain, just call, don't wait for others to do the calling...

 

[TMC]

My email to them got circulated around, and always to people who are away. Everything also Auto response replies.

 

[ortega]

what else is new?

the best way is not to join or submit rubbish pictures
then they will be wasting their time

 

[eikin]

no update on this?

 

[satay16]

no update on this?

they say they fixed it already. no exciting followup i guess.

 

[eikin]

they say they fixed it already. no exciting followup i guess.

seems like they disabled the access to member information.

rule #5 still applies for those who want to take part.