(this is a buying decision thread, pls consider/ help on the technical merit perspective,
instead of bbb :> , thanks in advance )
I am thinking getting K10D to document my nephew's indoor violin recital.
As such, no flash, not too near to stage.
Am thinking of ISO800 or ISO1600, handhold only.
I am thinking of matching it with 55-200, or can 43mm or 40/2.8 do it too?
Thanks in advance.
PS: I am an ex Nikon D50 user but has currently no lens baggage and hates using flash.
As such, I am open to different brands offering.
Like K10d for its relatively good price/performance, build quality.
Like to take environment portrait, kids, as such a quick, small less, e.g. 43mm or 40mm (for portability)
sound good to me. 21mm is also ok, but for general purpose, 43 or 40 seems more versatile.
instead of bbb :> , thanks in advance )
I am thinking getting K10D to document my nephew's indoor violin recital.
As such, no flash, not too near to stage.
Am thinking of ISO800 or ISO1600, handhold only.
I am thinking of matching it with 55-200, or can 43mm or 40/2.8 do it too?
Thanks in advance.
PS: I am an ex Nikon D50 user but has currently no lens baggage and hates using flash.
As such, I am open to different brands offering.
Like K10d for its relatively good price/performance, build quality.
Like to take environment portrait, kids, as such a quick, small less, e.g. 43mm or 40mm (for portability)
sound good to me. 21mm is also ok, but for general purpose, 43 or 40 seems more versatile.