It's Official - D300, D3 and Lenses etc
- Thread starter arpinkor
- Start date
- Status
I've always been puzzled about this preoccupation with ISO 100.
If ISO 200 on the D300 is cleaner than ISO 100 on the D200, why not just use ISO 200 and adjust shutter speed accordingly?
Just wondering lah, maybe someone can enlightenThanks!
Bro, sometimes max shutter speed is hit..
Example f1.4 @ 1/8000sec @ 200 ISO might not make it for a bright sunny day in S'pore.
ahh I see, thanks!
It never occurred to me that way, even with the scenario you described with aperture wide open on a very fast lens on a very bright day, it's such a unlikely scenario? Or are the folks who want ISO 100 even thinking of this scenario in the first place? Do they have such a fast lens in the first place?
Plus the fact that ISO 100 is available in the D300 albeit in the Lo mode, or you could still stick to the same shutter speed and adjust picture post-shot (i.e. manually mimicking Lo mode)
Just thinking aloud lah, cos it could be that they just need to understand themselves why they needed ISO 100 in the first place and make a better informed choice.
It never occurred to me that way, even with the scenario you described with aperture wide open on a very fast lens on a very bright day, it's such a unlikely scenario? Or are the folks who want ISO 100 even thinking of this scenario in the first place? Do they have such a fast lens in the first place?
Plus the fact that ISO 100 is available in the D300 albeit in the Lo mode, or you could still stick to the same shutter speed and adjust picture post-shot (i.e. manually mimicking Lo mode)
Just thinking aloud lah, cos it could be that they just need to understand themselves why they needed ISO 100 in the first place and make a better informed choice.
Oh ya.. Somthing came up again. ISO 100 is useful if you want slow shutter speed for light trail or water flow. I know can use ND filter but that is one more item to bring (to be lost or break.
)
KNIGHT ONG
Senior Member
Feels the FX forces .... :bsmilie:
Oh ya.. Somthing came up again. ISO 100 is useful if you want slow shutter speed for light trail or water flow. I know can use ND filter but that is one more item to bring (to be lost or break.
Unless you want really shallow DoF also, otherwise I think you can close the aperture a stop down to achieve the same effect..
Yes, but you can adjust aperture one stop down to get around it. Bright daylight with the sun on top probably isn't the best time to shoot too, although I understand that sometimes that cannot be helped, like outdoor events.
ortega
Moderator
it is useless to resist
Yes.. Want really shallow DOF. Else, can definately step down.
KNIGHT ONG
Senior Member
haha , I want BIGGER MP .... :sticktong
hands very very itchy... how ah. :embrass:
KNIGHT ONG
Senior Member
shake it out man ... :devil: :bsmilie:
Buy loh, its not that expensive as compared to B.... ;p
actually, delivery of my Baby girl (in absolute $ terms) in hospital is cheaper than the RRP of D3. :bsmilie:
Light trail in bright daylight - err, think that example doesn't hold. But if u really have to have shallow depth of field for water flow in really bright light that it would be over-exposed (unlikely though it may seem), then I'd suggest for you to use the same settings as you would have if you were using iso 100. The pic will be one stop under-exposed. Adjustments are then to be made post-shot.
Not light trail on a bright day. in the evening or night.
If you are using iso100, you could use 10 sec as compare to 5 sec using iso200.
Same principal as for water flow. Iso100 can use 4 sec, while iso200 can only used 2 sec.
Shallow dof and water/light trails are different example.
Ansel
Senior Member
What? which hospital is that? My two girls combined cost me D3, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200VR, 200-400VR man...:cry:
gooseberry
Senior Member
CYRN
Senior Member
FX FX FX. ;p
- Status
Similar threads
