All very true. Why can't they just stick a crapppy flash so I can do a little fill flash?
Where should that crappy flash go? Given the potential size of glass, there is simply no logical on the E-P1 to place it without increasing the size of the camera.
I hardly ever use the flash on my f100fd -- it's just not flexible enough. Besides, it gives me the excuse to get a FL36 ;p.
Why does it have to be the bottom lot of lcds every single time? This time it's worse because u rely on the LCD for the most important functions. The mediocre kits lens is disposable. Unfortnately there doesn't seem to be anything else better for a while.
Really depends on what the compromises really are. I find the LCD adequate -- it's not the best example out there but it does work okay for me. For the crappy photo I take, it's not a show-stopper. For framing, the LCD has adequate refresh rate, colour correctness and resolution.
Understand that it's not just the LCD if you want to increase the resolution but the entire system from the live-view recorder to the processor to the LCD. Then, there is the concern for refresh rate and battery life.
No comments about the kit lens as I find the 17mm eternally on the cam. Will be nicer to have a 17/1.4 but I'm not complaining since I love that FL. In fact, the FL makes the OVF quite useless since 17mm (35mm@35mm equi) is the easiest to frame -- just include a bit of your peripheral vision. The 14-42 is okay but a bit dark (it's a kit lens afterall).
And then, we have the Lumix 7-14mm. :lovegrin: