Having used a Macair for a year and been using Win based pc for over 20 years
Bad fingers, sorry.
Macs are not muscle machines. But what they have going for them is a very good suite of software that are easy to use and works in delivering results. There are professional software in both domains but keeping focus on what fulfills the majority of people, Apple does it well.
I bought a late MacAir last year for its lightweight advantage and some points for looks. Was using it to run Windows - ok, ok, no need to throw stones.... it was for some specialised software that needed flash and java.
Then got around to twiddling with the pre-loaded software and found iPhoto to serve the vast majority of my needs. I have Elements on my PC which is more powerful than iPhoto but for most of the time iPhoto suffices, especially that I can send my albums for printing and have it delivered - have not been able figure out where to print my albums created in Elements.
Just changed my mind on Aperture and got it for 2 reasons, album layout flexibility and the dodge and burn tool, don't think there are other options at $80.
With Flash and Java now working in Lion, it further reduced the necessity for Windows and I got a Mac Mini to replace my quad-core desktop. Less power but its much neater and has all the software I need, especially since I have the Mac version of Elements for the odd situation when I need a little more edit power.
The Mac is not better, just that its got better software for what matters to the vast majority of users.
-----
David,
Talk about ancient, I had the opportunity to splash $1200 for a HD Controller for a 20MB HD which later became 40MB when they implemented RLL compression algorithm, a 5MB Apple Sider on an Apple II before that, and a M6800 protoboard using switches as input devices......painful...