In what ways is 7D better than 5Dmk2, and vise versa.

[fleaz]

All else being equal, comparing just the images from both taken with the same composition, lens etc, the 5DII will produce a better final result.

Out of curiousity, are you viewing the end results with a magnifying glass? At sensible printing sizes, I see no difference.

 

[takengo2003]

Haha.... me too... anyone can lend me a 5DKII to try it out?

now i got the urge to rent a 5Dmk2 to try out over the weekends since i have a 40D now to compare with.

 

[hotwork77]

Out of curiousity, are you viewing the end results with a magnifying glass? At sensible printing sizes, I see no difference.

Depends on what difference you are look for. Full frame usually due to its lower pixel density tend to give a better image colour and the image is cleaner. There's a difference but for most people, that difference is not noticeable.

 

[colourfulfaces]

One interesting video. Enjoy.

[vid]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0toBw68L5Y4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0toBw68L5Y4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/vid]

 

[sinned79]

Out of curiousity, are you viewing the end results with a magnifying glass? At sensible printing sizes, I see no difference.

noise level noticeable when u shoot at ISO 6400 ;p

 

[flipfreak]

One interesting video. Enjoy.

[vid]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0toBw68L5Y4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0toBw68L5Y4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/vid]

good one. :sweat:

 

[ShaneKua]

One interesting video. Enjoy.

[vid]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0toBw68L5Y4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0toBw68L5Y4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/vid]

Awesome vid! HAHA!

 

[fleaz]

noise level noticeable when u shoot at ISO 6400 ;p

In a real world situation, how often would you need to shoot at ISO 6400?

 

[colourfulfaces]

In a real world situation, how often would you need to shoot at ISO 6400?

I think in some cases, we might use ISO6400. During events, most of the time, we must use ISO 3200 to get the ambience light even with an F2.8 lens.

With group shoots and the light is dim (example, esplanade foyer area), even when you use flash, you still required ISO3200 since aperture will be at least F4 or F5.6.

Noise in some situation can bring the mood across better than a clean sharp photo. Of cos i am not saying all the photos should be noisy but there will be variation from sharp to creative shots.