PaulRussell
New Member
learn composition, timing and technical stuff first. Then start replacing the kit lenses. Buy the best quality glass ou can afford. Lenses will last much longer than digital camera bodies.
The thing I am trying to say is that people are typing in CS forums as if the equipment are not of a matter as long as skill is there. From my POV, everything plays a part, the camera, the lens, the shooter, the external equipments. It is correct to say that people still can take good photos with minimum equipment, but with limitation. So please stop saying that it is the person behind the camera. It is like shooting firework without a stable tripod.
Thought we still can blame the person behind the camera for not getting a tripod:bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie:
The thing I am trying to say is that people are typing in CS forums as if the equipment are not of a matter as long as skill is there. From my POV, everything plays a part, the camera, the lens, the shooter, the external equipments. It is correct to say that people still can take good photos with minimum equipment, but with limitation. So please stop saying that it is the person behind the camera. It is like shooting firework without a stable tripod.
Thought we still can blame the person behind the camera for not getting a tripod:bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie:
FYI, upgrading to the D90 will probably cost you about $1k. For $1k and the money you receive from selling your sigma, you could buy a 35mm f1.8, an 85mm f1.8 and possibly and a decent tripod. This combination will definitely get you images with excellent image quality. Upgrading to a better makes absolutely no sense if you do not have the good lenses required to fully maximise the resolution of your camera.Most of the time I am using D70 and my cheap sigma 18-50 and somehow can do some decent photos but saving money for D90. D90 is a 2nd gen nikon chip that has better color and very high range of ISO (D70 minimum is 200 and at 800, its like **** with a lot of flies).
I totally agree with you on this! While I also agree that the person behind the camera is very very impt, the equipment and other factor also plays the part. Perhaps a good example is a very sophisticated photograph which we credit to a photographer, but to create that he also need a good stylist, a team of helpers for lighting, makeup artist, model, and access or money for good props and outfit. There is a reason why we have cheap and expensive equipment and it do play a part. And definitely photoshop!!!
Most of the time I am using D70 and my cheap sigma 18-50 and somehow can do some decent photos but saving money for D90. D90 is a 2nd gen nikon chip that has better color and very high range of ISO (D70 minimum is 200 and at 800, its like **** with a lot of flies).
FYI, upgrading to the D90 will probably cost you about $1k. For $1k and the money you receive from selling your sigma, you could buy a 35mm f1.8, an 85mm f1.8 and possibly and a decent tripod. This combination will definitely get you images with excellent image quality. Upgrading to a better makes absolutely no sense if you do not have the good lenses required to fully maximise the resolution of your camera.
Totally agree with you as I'm still holding on to my D70...the crazy WB, green cast, low ability to crop, high iso noise + out of the blue moon NEF tt's "encounter end of file" error....:sweat:
Nevertheless, still loving it...but already has same plan as you whenever the shutter is going to give way...haha... lens, body and pg is always impt...what proportion each should be really depends on the user then...
Mine is also having dementia. Once in a while, the display will show -E- and I have to push-pull the memory card for it to recognize.... let's face it, size do matter.![]()
The thing I am trying to say is that people are typing in CS forums as if the equipment are not of a matter as long as skill is there. From my POV, everything plays a part, the camera, the lens, the shooter, the external equipments. It is correct to say that people still can take good photos with minimum equipment, but with limitation. So please stop saying that it is the person behind the camera. It is like shooting firework without a stable tripod.
Thought we still can blame the person behind the camera for not getting a tripod:bsmilie::bsmilie::bsmilie:
Yes they are all impt. but there's still an order of importance.
person>lens>camera
hmmm... I agree with what you said... to a small extent. On the other hand, I really really hope you do realise absolute sharpness doesn't matter in real life. I have printed images roughly the size of A1 from a 10mp D200/N24-70 combo for an exhibition last year. I had a friend who owns a Canon 50D/C24-70 combo but despite his camera having 50% more megapixels than mine, there was absolutely no difference in the quality of the images even when looking really close. (photographic skills aside)Sorry but I don't totally agree with this. Actually I already have half a dozen lenses, including the nikkor 85mm, and 2 decent tripod. My point is that even with these prime lenses, the body is still the brain that will decode what the lens will see. Aside from the fact that 6megapixel is the maximum reproduction uncropped at 300 dpi... really need a higher resolution. Or I can say that I have reached the maximum quality resolution for that particular body and its becoming a crutch (I also post-process so each pixel really count). Anyway, my point is that the sigma 18-50 is one of my fave lens, even compared to a few of my nikkor ones; and a better brain to complement this lens will be a better choice for me.
hmmm... I agree with what you said... to a small extent. On the other hand, I really really hope you do realise absolute sharpness doesn't matter in real life. I have printed images roughly the size of A1 from a 10mp D200/N24-70 combo for an exhibition last year. I had a friend who owns a Canon 50D/C24-70 combo but despite his camera having 50% more megapixels than mine, there was absolutely no difference in the quality of the images even when looking really close. (photographic skills aside)
Most of the time I am using D70 and my cheap sigma 18-50 and somehow can do some decent photos but saving money for D90. D90 is a 2nd gen nikon chip that has better color and very high range of ISO (D70 minimum is 200 and at 800, its like **** with a lot of flies).