Don't forget the bicycle manufacturer :bsmilie:
FYI Brompton does not need this except maybe for publicity endorsement ..... there is already a global waiting list for their bikes
Don't forget the bicycle manufacturer :bsmilie:
FYI Brompton does not need this except maybe for publicity endorsement ..... there is already a global waiting list for their bikes
so it mean it is a good bike and a good buy?... there is already a global waiting list for their bikes
9V-Orion Images said:Replace National Parks (NParks) with Ministry of Manpower (MoM) and Brompton bicycles with Herman Miller chairs and it will be the same identical thread all over again. :bsmilie:
Actually it could beFYI Brompton does not need this except maybe for publicity endorsement ..... there is already a global waiting list for their bikes
Complain, defending, argue...
in the end, what can you do about it?....
Absolutely NOTHING.
saying that we do nothing except complaining is also an act of complaining :sweat:The problem here is that besides complaining, what else did the Singaporeans do?
Absolutely NOTHING.
Sorry but your example don't pan out. You mean, a D7000 or 7D or even a K5 cannot handle the job compared to a higher spec camera? Furthermore the business of photography requires the use of a camera (duh....) and having a good one does in some way helps you but in no way guarantee a great picture. And also it is a business that requires to fund its own gears.
Compared this to the job of nparks people to, what I assume to be, doing checks, maintenance and repairs - which does not limit itself to the use of a bicycle does it? One can do it or foot, motorbike, scooter -> a motor-driven kick scooter, skateboard, rollerblade, etc. I think you get what I mean, it doesn't need a bicycle to do the job but a bicycle perhaps happens to be the most logical and most efficient way to do it (as an enthusiast I support it whole-heartedly). But in this case we owe it to ourself to ask whether spending 2.2k on a bicycle is worth it? This is the public's money. If we do proper due diligence before we purchase anything on ourself (to ensure that it is what we need, at the best possible price) why not this? Filter out all the crap and talking-**** on alot of the other forums, this seems to be the general consensus.
Yes I do know the quality of a bromptom, I've even considered buying one. Also te GT 2.0 is a a good value for money bike imo but all things considered after riding through the connector parks from Jurong all the way to East Coast park - on pavement, grass, on paved-roads, gravel which I think it would be very good for, I ended up buying a monotine single-speed (not their foldable bike but this) swapped out the default tires and so far so good and that after a year, with the occasional check and clean once a week, single-gear is so easy to maintain compared to my mtb with derailleurs. It is a good sturdy bike, light enough and for not much money - $150 infact (plus additional items). I bought it 2nd-hand off a guy who has ridden it pretty good.
And you gotta understand the knee-jerk reaction on gov spending after the recent fiasco.
And 10km/hr is 10km/hr no matter what bike u ride. It is a bike to do a job anyway, not to race.
Complain, defending, argue...
in the end, what can you do about it?....
Absolutely NOTHING.
Lets try not to make unfair comparisons of private purchases up against public purchases. There is almost always an abundance of overexpenditure on the earlier depending on how you see it.
You are not wrong. Technically a smaller wheel bicycle has its own advantages and speed will not be compromised. But the Npark officials will have a better ride handling uneven terrains with say 26" MTB or 700cc cyclocrosses or city bikes for instance.
Oh wait I forgot. One of the requirements being needing to fold and bring up public transports.
Then again there is the beautiful IF Mode.
Canonised said:If you think paying $2,200 for a bicycle for park usage is reasonable, I can only say that you are out of touch with money! maybe we have too much reserves!
mettaxu said:Totally agree with Canonised. If a minister can back nparks opinion that $2200 for a bicycle is reasonable, then the time has come for the middle class Singaporeans to be very afraid: soon *** ministers will say $8 chicken rice is cheap, $50 taxi fare is peanuts, $3 million CEO pay is just, 10% GST is low, $4 ERP is insufficient, and healthcare heart bypass is affordable at only $8...
Agetan said::bsmilie:
If Singapore Government buy cheap bikes... Singaporean say Wah... no standard...
If Singapore Government buy mid-price bikes... Singaporean say Wah... neither here nor there..
If Singapore Government buy expensive bikes... Singaporean say... Wah... why so expensive???
Either way, I think the Government say, stuff this... being call standard or neither here nor there, might as well get complaint as expensive right??? since either way... they will get complaint...
They do know what you are thinking... anything also complaint... :bsmilie:
Oh well, Police gets volvo/bmw/WRX and change of new cars every 1-2years, i think those would make these 26 bicycle looks like peanut...
EH wait, Peanut is 600k a year![]()