Good travel lense <$1200 for EOS 550D


the 70-200 f4l is a really great lens. really sharp. and if paired with ur 15-85 i think u'd be all set. as for travel lens...personally i use the tamron 28-75 f2.8. its half the px of the canon version and good enough for travel shots in my opinion.
 

I doubt many people have the 15-85 as much as the 18-200 or 17-40L people. The 15-85 costs more than the two said lenses.
 

I read alot about the 15-85 in other review sites, and all of them seems to praise the 15-85 as an excellent lense, downside being the price, but considering it is a new lense I think it'll be a good worthwhile investment. It seems to have the range and the IQ i'm looking for.

I think I will try some at the local stores and share my experience with it!
 

I would hardly call a new retail lens a "good investment" though. Good buys come from the used market.
 

how much is a EF-S 17-55 F2.8 IS USM ?
 

According to the price guide in CS:

EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM - $1130 (MS Main, Jan10) | $1180 (MS Hub, Jan10) | $1113 (PA-HV, Jan10) | $1114 (SLRR, Jan10) | $1036 (DD Electronics, grey, Jan10) | $1080 cash (JO, w/ GST, Mar10) | $1060 (CP, wo GST, Mar10) | $1150 cash (AP-F, w/ GST, Mar10) | $1125 (PA-E, w/ GST, Apr10)

Canon's RRP - $ 1,369
 

Owned a Canon 18-200mm on a 500D before....sold the 18-200mm....regret....spent money and bought another one.

At that time, I already had the 17-55 and the 24-105...........

It was really a great lens for lazy person like me (dun like to change lens). Image was sharp enough for me and I pixel peep.....
 

if u want to use single lens, 18-200 mm is the choice. I'm currently using this lens and it's for sale since i seldom travel and only use my camera for event. Telephoto lens is more important for me.hahahahaha

15-85 also a good lens. i read a good review.
24-105 is not really suitable for me in crop body. It's not wide enough...

*just my 2 cents opinion*
:D:D

I would go with this. Think 24 will just not be wide enough
 

hmmm, but i thought the tamron 18-270 is also f5.6 @ 200mm? So is focusing slower due to other reasons?

For Tamron 18-270VC @ 200mm the max aperture is F6.3, thus result in the slower focusing.
 

For Tamron 18-270VC @ 200mm the max aperture is F6.3, thus result in the slower focusing.

Nope, its f/5.6.

The max aperture for range between 91-237mm is f/5.6.
 

Nope, its f/5.6.

The max aperture for range between 91-237mm is f/5.6.
Are you sure? The info from dpreview lens review is different from what you state. See below of page from link.

http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/tamron_18-270_3p5-6p3_vc_n15/page2.asp

Quote:
"The 18-270mm is about a third of a stop darker than the Canon and Nikon 18-200mm lenses from around 100mm onwards - not a significant difference in real world use."
 

Hi guy,
I was holding 18-200 mm quiet long, until I try my friend L Lens, yes, the IQ result is an issue for 18-200 mm if you already try the L lens.

just like, my first audio set is Sony combo and happy with it, until I visite my friend house with sony Home theatre set. :bsmilie:
 

i have both 24-105 and 15-85. I don think focusing time is a concern if its landscape and shooting friends in a group.All can wait a extra 1 or 2 secs? Quality similar and i pixel peep sometimes. For my 550D and 7D,i would use 24-105L as my quick snaps and videoing. Where 550D with 15-85 since it much lighter for a light body. Since TS mentioned about traveling, portrait, landscape. Changing lens to give opitmum results also not too possible for just 1 lens. I would suggest a EFS 15-85mm since is upgrade ver of 17-85mm(was told from a shop).
 

Nope, its f/5.6.

The max aperture for range between 91-237mm is f/5.6.

Really? :dunno:

Is there a new Mark 2 for this lens that "the-digital-picture" is using that I am not aware? :think:

Personally I don't have much hand-on experience on the Tamron lens, care to share yours? :)
 

Last edited:
Hi guy,
I was holding 18-200 mm quiet long, until I try my friend L Lens, yes, the IQ result is an issue for 18-200 mm if you already try the L lens.

True... the IQ of most L zoom are better than non L zoom likewise most L primes are better than the L zooms. ;)
 

Was just wondering, I am seeing very few people reselling the 15-85mm on clubsnap, is it because it is a keeper lense, or is it because not many people got it yet? Some are quite happy with it (like limleong), but other than that I don't really hear much about it as compared to the other general purpose lense.

As for future consideration, I personally would buy a 70-200mm f4 IS lense to pair up with the 15-85mm. Do you guys think it'll be a good combo?

The 15-85mm + 70-200mm is a very good combo and you get good IQ and range. Prob you dont see much people selling the 15-85mm on BnS is because its relatively new and its a keeper lens as well.
 

Really? :dunno:

Is there a new Mark 2 for this lens that "the-digital-picture" is using that I am not aware? :think:

Personally I don't have much hand-on experience on the Tamron lens, care to share yours? :)

I don't think its any different from the one dpreview reviewed back in December 2008.
 

Hi everyone, thanks again for your invaluable input. Based on what most of you have recommended, I think I've managed to narrow down my choices to the 18-200mm or the 15-85mm. Though I'm more inclined to 15-85mm due to the reviews regarding the good IQ, and USM, cause that is what I really want in my future travel lense.

It is true the 24-105 L does seem a little lacking for the wide angle portion, and will require a UWA lense to cover it. I think the main reason I am attracted to it is because of the L quality and resale value, and it may not be that practical for APS-C cameras, probably it'll be very front heavy or a body like 550D.

Was just wondering, I am seeing very few people reselling the 15-85mm on clubsnap, is it because it is a keeper lense, or is it because not many people got it yet? Some are quite happy with it (like limleong), but other than that I don't really hear much about it as compared to the other general purpose lense.

As for future consideration, I personally would buy a 70-200mm f4 IS lense to pair up with the 15-85mm. Do you guys think it'll be a good combo?

My setup is 10-22 and 24-105 which pretty much covers the range needed.

that said, on my travel, i find that i have my 10-22 mounted for 90% of the time. i personally find that if there is a need to zoom, all i have to do is just move closer. on travels, the wide is much more valuable. even if i'm in some indoor places, i prefer the wide as i wanted to take shots of the interior.
 

I don't think its any different from the one dpreview reviewed back in December 2008.

You have the Tamron lens? Maybe it would be benefit most with a short test at yourside to verify the result from the two review site. :)
 

Back
Top