Gallery - (more) humble Nikon Lenses


Can we have a standard format because people can write it in different ways.

For example, AF50mm/1.8D or AF 50mm f/1.8D (with spaces) or even AF-D50/1.8. I think searching with these numbers could never give me what I was looking for.

Most of the time I'll drop the f and mm and have the focal length and aperture as an entire block. So I would write 35/1.8 or 18-200/3.5-5.6. Usually never put the letters because there doesn't seem to be a standard format (space or no space).

i like the idea of this gallery for all the not-so-expensive lenses.

can i suggest 2 things to keep this thread managable?

a) please (if you can) list down the entire designation of the lens - ie, all the alphabets and watnots of the complete lens' name. this will make searching on the CS engine much easier. better still if you can tag your posts with keywords.

b) kindly refrain from commenting on the lens, the pictures, or asking questions about the lens' performance etc... this will keep the thread tidy and not to bust the 1000-post limit on all threads. if you want to review the lens, please do it in another thread or post it inside General Tech sub-forum.

c) pls follow the guidelines (http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109839)

thanks folks! :)

since this thread is growing, just to remind everyone abt keeping it tidy and try follow Isisaxon's lens naming suggestion. :)
 

Shot taken with kit lens 18-70/3.5-4.5.


DSC_9259.jpg
 

lake tekapo :thumbsup:

Huh? This is new - was there, but don't recall... Then again, I was there like April. Must be some part that I missed exploring...
 

RMC tokina 80-200mm f4

hi all, this one really surprised me with its performance. i started looking for an 80-200 f4 after playing with minolta's 'beer can'. it was so compact compared to my 80-200 2.8. tried nikon's 70-210, but wasnt up to standard. then i chanced upon this and thought i d give it a try. surprisingly good from f4. i mostly shoot primes and it compares fairly well so it is really good. most importantly, the colour and contrast are very natural yet punchy.

4971620071_3133a551c3_z.jpg


4972233366_76c7e9154a_z.jpg


4971619853_c31ba6ca87_z.jpg


all wide open at 200mm, iso 1600 on d200. cropped abit.

regards,
benjamin
 

Last edited:
wow, sharp images and ISO 1600 from D200 amazing.
 

wow, sharp images and ISO 1600 from D200 amazing.

yea, its abit smudgy, but for about 8r its more than enough. it also helps to have faster lenses. waiting for the d700 successor =D
 

Seriously lar Bro...... other then the great Nikon gears you guys have... more importantly, it's your skill lar.... I also have Nikon gears... but cannot reach the level you guys at... hmmm.... :dunno::cry::rolleyes:
 

d90 + af-s micro nikkor 105mm f/2.8g if-ed

5017093519_83e55acc2c.jpg
 

Last edited:
Back
Top