FZriends Thread (FZ18 & FZ28 users and ex-users group - part II)


Status
Not open for further replies.
yep, must know my own weakness ma, and conceal it.
can view at 640x480 without prob lah (or 1048 with one eye closed), just that i set the resolution at my blog already, lazy to upload again.

Just like to ask if anyone found the pix a little soft. 'cos when i tried pp sharpen, it seems to look better.
slightly soft la, but its normal, if i were to use my dslr to take, i think also will be soft, due to the low shutter speeds and short zoom range :P
 

:think: will do an outdoor sports photography then...up the shutter speed and zoom like crazy again.. see what kinda results i will get. Haha

Finding all kinda reasons to justify my spending.
 

Last edited:
Just up the ISO :P

Dun worry about noise, I personally would rather have noisy image than blur image :)
 

Hello, navlem and ombre... sorry for late reply, because i just back from holiday at Taiwan and busy with my project too.
Ya, recently i played around with my Canon 40D with 24-105 L F4 len.. really heavy, but the photo quality really sharp and nice..
Besides, FZ 28 always with me when i din bring my canon 40D go out.. :P
 

Wow, Canon 40D with L lens somemore :D

Must burnt quite a huge hole in your pocket :P
 

Haha.. worth to own it.. nice to bring for travel and walk around. :)
Now need to be save, cannot buy other thing already. Haha.
So when is our FZ member outing again?
 

Dunno yet leh, everybody too busy le..haha

DSLR is well worth the $$ :P
 

Just up the ISO :P

Dun worry about noise, I personally would rather have noisy image than blur image :)

haha i understand. Out of focus/blur shots cannot PP, noisy still can suppress...
=) stop sticking your tongue out.
 

haha i understand. Out of focus/blur shots cannot PP, noisy still can suppress...
=) stop sticking your tongue out.
Used to sticking my tongue out le :P

Yeah, thats one of the reason why I prefer noisy image over blur image.
 

A few bird close ups at the park yesterday with the FZ28.

RC


#1 Yellow-Crowned Night Heron
20090308p1100179.jpg


#2 Black-Crowned Night Heron
20090308p1100241.jpg


#3 Snowy Egret
20090308p1100192.jpg


#4 Blue Jay
20090308p1100270.jpg


#5 Yellow-Crowned Night Heron
20090308p1100247.jpg
 

Excellent shots! It's been a while since I used a FZ camera... :)
 

Hello, navlem and ombre... sorry for late reply, because i just back from holiday at Taiwan and busy with my project too.
Ya, recently i played around with my Canon 40D with 24-105 L F4 len.. really heavy, but the photo quality really sharp and nice..
Besides, FZ 28 always with me when i din bring my canon 40D go out.. :P

WOAH ARE YOU MAD?!? Haha.

Why didnt you buy the 24-70mm F2.8 L instead? They're nearly the same price!
 

WOAH ARE YOU MAD?!? Haha.

Why didnt you buy the 24-70mm F2.8 L instead? They're nearly the same price!
Calm down, haha

I guessed he need the extra focal length?
 

WOAH ARE YOU MAD?!? Haha.

Why didnt you buy the 24-70mm F2.8 L instead? They're nearly the same price!

Just a note, there is no IS for 24-70mm lens which is found in the 24-105mm... :think:
 

Just a note, there is no IS for 24-70mm lens which is found in the 24-105mm... :think:

Aye, true, but depending on what you shoot, IS can be overlooked most of the time. I just felt that the 24-70 is more bang for bucks.
 

Aye, true, but depending on what you shoot, IS can be overlooked most of the time. I just felt that the 24-70 is more bang for bucks.
Different people have different perspectives ba.
 

Aye, true, but depending on what you shoot, IS can be overlooked most of the time. I just felt that the 24-70 is more bang for bucks.

To me not really.... IS is very important to me.... Even in F4 shots, I can also use a bounced flash to control my lighting... to make it as "bright" as F2.8
 

To me not really.... IS is very important to me.... Even in F4 shots, I can also use a bounced flash to control my lighting... to make it as "bright" as F2.8

I think this will boil down to preference already... in anycase, haha I know my expression was kind of over-reactive, but it was just an expression.

Both are equally good lenses, but given the prices, I'd go for the F2.8.

With Flash, there are 2 ways to see it. If you have flash, most probably you're at least clearing 1/60s and you probably can push your shutter up and pump your flash harder for hand-holdable speeds.

For me, I try to avoid relying on flash for main light, to me, flash is strictly for filling or at best abit of lighting compensation. (This would be in events context, portraits would be a different story). If shallow DOF is not an issue, I'd still shoot at F2.8 even without flash, to catch as much natural light as I can. Even if that means pushing ISO up to 800.

Then again, I'm not pro with the flash, so others may feel otherwise. But all in all, I prefer speed over the IS. The bit of range can be compensated I guess, although the range makes a good walk around for FF.

In discussion with some pros, they expressed that if you do events, most of the times you won't need faster than F4 since you will want to capture everyone in your pics and need a big DOF. That may be the best reason I can think of for choosing the 24-105L instead. :)


err... we are starting to become a non-panasonic forum. =X

Anyway, a lot of people have been asking for outing yar... I haven't got the motivation to plan, and our dear skyguy has been really busy too! Myself I am working hard for my coming exams as well. But 20 March - 5 Apr is an ideal time for me to play around with my camera :D Anyone can throw in a suggestion, I really don't know Singapore well hah. ? I can still be the point of contact.
 

Last edited:
I think this will boil down to preference already... in anycase, haha I know my expression was kind of over-reactive, but it was just an expression.

Both are equally good lenses, but given the prices, I'd go for the F2.8.

With Flash, there are 2 ways to see it. If you have flash, most probably you're at least clearing 1/60s and you probably can push your shutter up and pump your flash harder for hand-holdable speeds.

For me, I try to avoid relying on flash for main light, to me, flash is strictly for filling or at best abit of lighting compensation. (This would be in events context, portraits would be a different story). If shallow DOF is not an issue, I'd still shoot at F2.8 even without flash, to catch as much natural light as I can. Even if that means pushing ISO up to 800.

Then again, I'm not pro with the flash, so others may feel otherwise. But all in all, I prefer speed over the IS. The bit of range can be compensated I guess, although the range makes a good walk around for FF.

In discussion with some pros, they expressed that if you do events, most of the times you won't need faster than F4 since you will want to capture everyone in your pics and need a big DOF. That may be the best reason I can think of for choosing the 24-105L instead. :)
Depend on the focal length that you are shooting, using IS would allow you to use a slower shutter speed and allow you get in more light.

To me with good control of your ETTL flash & favorable condition, ambient lighting could still be capture with the use of bounced flash. Like you mention earlier for indoor event shoot, normally most of use an external flash & use a smaller aperture (bigger DoF). If you are using a bigger aperture such as F2.8 (or bigger), I guess you could use burst shots in place of IS... :)
 

Last edited:
Depend on the focal length that you are shooting, using IS would allow you to use a slower shutter speed and allow you get in more light.

To me with good control of your ETTL flash & favorable condition, ambient lighting could still be capture with the use of bounced flash. Like you mention earlier for indoor event shoot, normally most of use an external flash & use a smaller aperture (bigger DoF). If you are using a bigger aperture such as F2.8 (or bigger), I guess you could use burst shots in place of IS... :)

This depends too I think... hm. Melvan and I just did an event coverage last saturday. Don't know about his shots, but I think he was using faster shutter speeds. For me, I used 1/80s, ISO 800, F4.5, FEC about -1.7 on a 24-85mm F3.5-4.5 throughout. I find that lens a cheap alternative to the 24-105L, like 20% the price, & good wide open. In anycase thats not my main point, the sad thing is that I lost quite a few spontaneous moments due to subject movement, not handshake. I didn't consider on that day that 1/80 might be too slow & didn't have time to review properly. =(

Anyway, care to share how do you usually use your settings? I was kinda struggling with finding the proper FEC that day.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top