Oh, I forgot to add, Nikon ultra-wides (14-24, 17-35, 20, PCE24, etc) are awesome compared to Canon's.
1. Nikon is of much better quality than let's say any of the Canon camera bodies I have handled (10D,20D,30D,40D,50D,5D....). Can't say about 1D series thou.
2. Metering system and flash system way ahead of Canons.
3. Auto-Focus accuracy in new breed of Nikon's is a killer. None of the Canon camera bodies I have mentioned above come even closer to these. Canon is no doubt faster to acquire the focus, but accuracy is something, which I have not been happy with Canon's.
4. High ISO noise from D700 is much-much better than anything I have ever used before. D300 is no slouch either in this department.
5. Commander mode in Nikon is god send. For the similar functionality in Canon, you have to spend extra $$ and carry one extra hardware to lug around.
6. I like colors from Canon better than Nikons. Having said that, I can simulate similar colors in Nikon in post-processing. Which is one extra step in the total processing.
7. I like the quality control checks in Nikon more than Canon anyday. I always had problems with the cheap 50mm 1.8 from Canon (back-focus). But the similar lens 50mm 1.8 from Nikon works flawless.
8. Out of 10 products I bought in last 4years from Canon, 4 of them had some problem or the other. One of my camera bodies went to Canon service center more than once for back-focusing/front-focusing problems. And they were not able to fix it 100%. I had to test four of the L series lenses in Canon to get a sharp copy. Again this the quality check issue I have already mentioned in point 7. I am yet to encounter any malfunctioning from Nikons.
The main thing for me is Nikon's much better built n MUCH tougher than Canon's stuff. I have many friends ( some professionals )who's using Canon n the main gripe is some times even the higher end bodies ( esp. 5D's mirror !) like 1 D ++ onwards breaks down quite regularly.
Do you have extensive experience comparing the PCE 24 to TS-E 24? Interested to know what the results are.
Not definitive yet. Centre both ok. Corners PCE wins.
hmmm saw this interesting thread...so tot i join in.
waiting for 5d mark ii to hit the shores before deciding.
4. High ISO noise from D700 is much-much better than anything I have ever used before. D300 is no slouch either in this department.
5D Mark II may just knock the crown off d700 though.
Well what i do like about canon is...
1. It's cheaper than Nikon. =D
2. got constant f4 lenses. (travel light)
With shifting?
Well a few things I prefer about Nikon that nobody ever seems to say are
- Mirror and shutter sound (Go compare D40 with 400D)
Ha, you got it. I always find the shutter sound from Nikon a turn on ! well, many might say I am nuts but somehow the shoik feeling should be part of the factor (though not all or the one reason) in parting some much $ on a DSLR right ?! ;p
Ha, you got it. I always find the shutter sound from Nikon a turn on ! well, many might say I am nuts but somehow the shoik feeling should be part of the factor (though not all or the one reason) in parting some much $ on a DSLR right ?! ;p
Welcome to the Dark side,
I was a SONY prosumer user (H5) and I own a Nikon D80 + D300 now. I agree with some of you who mentioned that once they hold the Nikon D300 and they wouldn't want to let it go. I have the same sentiment too. The curvature of the camera just make it perfect to hold, like a lady
The looks of the Nikon D300 + MB D10 + any of the Nikkor lenses make it a perfect 'Chio Bu'. I bought the D300 in July and until today I am still admiring it's beauty. It is indeed a fusion of Art and Technology.
I am simply in Love with it :heart: