If what you say is true..this is a case that could end careers and create quite a hoopla for the Police force if you launch a complain like this. How did you come to deduce it was an aduction and if the Jap and girl has left, how you know she was raped later or she was raped before the aduction? What else did you or anyone else did in the mean time after the call? If you say crime scene..what is define as a crime scene to you? The rape took place there?
I can't see why a police would pick up a phone and put in his pocket like that unless he is asking for trouble of not just damaging evidence but for theft too. If it was a site of a crime, a team would be sent down to take evidence. So the case was fully screwed as you did a follow up on the case as a concern citizen or you launch a report on the police. I have to assume since you did do a course in Criminology in the States you have to be involve in some way with the Police or Crime detection organisation? So you could have use your influence to get more details or file a complaint of incompetency with the division? When did this happen?
Something don't sound right..care to elaborate? I would like to know more.
This sound more like a badly written Taiwan soap opera then something that happens in Singapore.
I can't see why a police would pick up a phone and put in his pocket like that unless he is asking for trouble of not just damaging evidence but for theft too. If it was a site of a crime, a team would be sent down to take evidence. So the case was fully screwed as you did a follow up on the case as a concern citizen or you launch a report on the police. I have to assume since you did do a course in Criminology in the States you have to be involve in some way with the Police or Crime detection organisation? So you could have use your influence to get more details or file a complaint of incompetency with the division? When did this happen?
As to my my influence on this case (whether or not I had learned criminology or whether I have any contact I know to rake up the matter) is not relevant. I saw myself as a normal citizen. I did my best using the correct protocol which I was taught. It was not my job to teach a police officer (at crime scene) how to handle evidences as he was answerable to his division head. I was only disappointed from what I saw. It was my point of view. No big deal.
As for rape, I admit, it was a conclusion that led me to think. I apologize if anyone disagrees with my viewpoints. Perhaps something good did happened and the guilty looking Japanese man was her sole savior who resisted any form of aid on the street. Perhaps they were playing S&M after that and had a great night. Or perhaps the police solved the case and forgot to update me. Perhaps we should all have a beer.
Peace.![]()
This is rather bad, for such a small place, I can nearly get to Changi from my Clementi AYE exit in that time. The police are only a 5 minute walk down the road from most places!
did you lodge a complaint with the higher ups?
Alright, this may be the last few queries I reply as i think i am doing OT here. Anymore question regarding this incident, feel free to pm me, please.
To be frank, I saw no point to file a complain for such. It was my point of view that a certain procedure wasnt followed in handling evidences. What I learned about Criminal and Justice was in usa. This is Singapore and they may have their practices. I placed the case in absolute trust it would be handled in a professional manner. Right or wrong, it was not for me take it up further. Honestly, I gave up after what I saw and I kept telling myself it was just my point of view.
If the Japanese man had caught up with me in one of the three chase, he might have beaten me up as he was very stout, fit looking and filled with anger over me. Over a few minutes, I repeatedly risked my life to save a helpless lady (who could be drugged and/or drunk), did what I could best but just felt something wasn't correctly handled by the police.
I always tell myself this is Asia. Asians have their ways of doing things. Right or wrong, I leave it with higher justice in heaven to judge. For me, I do my part to contribute back to society in little ways within my limits - if at all my efforts meant anything meaningful at all.
Anyway, this case has been >4 yrs already. It's a bit late to make such a complain.
Which part of Clementi do you stay? Whats the block number?
Our police is really quite useless from all the anecdotal accounts I've heard. Once in a while they'll solve a high profile case and put it in crime watch for positive publicity. But the usual everyday cases lodged usually meets with no response or a lousy response, or a "its a civil claim" response.
Our police is really quite useless from all the anecdotal accounts I've heard. Once in a while they'll solve a high profile case and put it in crime watch for positive publicity. But the usual everyday cases lodged usually meets with no response or a lousy response, or a "its a civil claim" response.
last one too: while i agree with you that the crime scene was contanminated and it sounds like the police didn't handle the case properly, i do think that you shouldn't be applying American Criminal Justice here unless you studied criminology not law. different legal systems...
If its a civil claim, there isn't anything the police can do. There are boundaries to what they can and cannot do. This is part and parcel of a society governed by law, not a cowboy town where the sheriff can bend the law in the name of justice. Most of the time when civilians are unhappy with the efficiency of the police force (although there are genuine exceptions), it is becos they are unaware of the inner mechanisms and limitations of the system. Adding to the fact they the men in blue are only normal human beings (not some dramatized CSI detectives manipulated for domestic viewers' consumption); its furthers adds to the system of imperfection. I sure would like to know which police force in the world can meet everyone's demanding expectations.
If its a civil claim, there isn't anything the police can do. There are boundaries to what they can and cannot do. This is part and parcel of a society governed by law, not a cowboy town where the sheriff can bend the law in the name of justice. Most of the time when civilians are unhappy with the efficiency of the police force (although there are genuine exceptions), it is becos they are unaware of the inner mechanisms and limitations of the system. Adding to the fact they the men in blue are only normal human beings (not some dramatized CSI detectives manipulated for domestic viewers' consumption); its furthers adds to the system of imperfection. I sure would like to know which police force in the world can meet everyone's demanding expectations.
As for rape, I admit, it was a conclusion that led me to think. I apologize if anyone disagrees with my viewpoints. Perhaps something good did happened and the guilty looking Japanese man was her sole savior who resisted any form of aid on the street. Perhaps they were playing S&M after that and had a great night. Or perhaps the police solved the case and forgot to update me. Perhaps we should all have a beer.
Peace.![]()
hi Snowspeeder,
while i partially agree on the reality of imperfection in even the best organisation but e men in blue is not jus any other uniform. is it not a symbol of a high level of professionalism attached to it? if reaching a crime scene (or 1 that is unfolding, eg, a brawl) in e shortest time possible is not even possible in such a small country state wad more can we count on them for? y even hav emergency numbers like 999/995, y not jus e usual 8-digit number? ttz be-cos in an emergency speed is of e essence. even fast food delivery guys knows this. :faint:
& ttz jus a small part of rants... :sweat: mayb a news crew would do jus fine recording e events in clips. now there's hard evidence eh? :flame:
The trouble is, the facts clearly disclose a criminal offence, but they say "civil claim". I have heard stories of "civil claim" ranging from boy beat girl, to car driving recklessly and banging 3-4 cars parked etc.
I personally had one report lodged for a van driving dangerously, almost hitting a pedestrian. A description of the driver (Indian, etc) and license plate was given...and guess what the police told me?
"Oh we contacted the owner of the van and HE TOLD ME that their company do not have Indian drivers".
And so the police decided there isn't enough evidence.
Its almost the same as the police accepting a suspect's statement saying "EH I never murder, I was never there" at face value without bothering to ask further.
Hmmm...I'm not sure about the facts of the case you're referring to. But was there recorded evidence on the reckless driving? Was the pedestrian with you when lodging a report? Was there injury and ambulance called? Cos if its just a person or 2 making unsubstantiated claims without evidence, what do you expect the police to do? Get a warrant to search the driver's company? If you're not sure how things work, can always write in to the HQ to get an answer. I think that jumping to conclusions won't help anyone really.
There is no recorded evidence, but there is eyewitness evidence.
There was no injury and no ambulance called. As you may have noted above, it was a near miss.
Many crimes are reported and convicted solely based on eyewitness testimony, e.g. molest cases.
If the person reporting it is not to be believed, then why is the police believing the other person, especially the suspect? Aren't both at least equal? If so, wouldn't it warrant further investigation rather than just believing one party over another?
FYI, more info since you apparently think the police did their job well. Initially, due to the fast moving circumstance, only the first letters of the license plate and the number was noted. The last letter was not noted. The colour of the van was noted.
You know what the police told me? "OH you dont have the complete license number, we can't do anything".
It was only after I suggested "why dont you check the vehicle records, see which ones are vans, have license number and first letters correspond, then form there, cross check to see which one match the colour". It was only after I, a layman not in the field of investigations suggesting that, then they went "Oh, okay".
And they promptly came up with one shortlisted registration (after which the whole affair about the asking the owner if they have Indian workers started".
I only expect the police to investigate, not to conclude, but it appears even asking them to investigate is squeezing blood from a stone.
I'm not sure who is the one jumping to conclusions here.