Dufresne said:
And it does not take repeated attempts to amount to sexual harrasement. Blackbird, judging from the way you speak and assuming you're an alpha type guy (probably homophobic too), if a homosexual flashes his privates to you in a locker room deliberately, just once, would you feel outraged? Honestly?
QUOTE]
I agree with you that if a homosexual flashes his private to someone in a locker room deliberately, it's not appropriate, even for the first time. Because it is not pre-arrange that the party can go nude or exposed his private in front of her. However, in this case, the female photographer knows that she is going to do nude shoot where the male model is going to exposed his private for the shoot. That's the difference. On the other hand, if a male photographer were to take a female model nude portfolio, does it mean that the male photographer is a peeping tom ???
No blackbird I believe you self-deceptively got it all wrong. Either that or your logic is in question.
Never had I once said that a nude shoot in a proper state is a case of sexual harrasement. I believe I was referring to the model making himself erect(deliberately) in front of the photographer without prior consent.
I never once said that exposing one's privates in a nude shoot is sexual harrasement. Perhaps the example I gave, being of a different context, confused the 2 of you like-minded people. My apologies.
But in any case if you (Blackbird and Red Indian Chief) still insist that is ok to make yourself erect in front of a photographer, be it male or female, maybe you two should start a new forum topic championing your own brand of ethics for male nude photography.
