Female photographers for artistic male shots

[ClearHead777]

Hi

Well, I think taking nude shoots is already inappropriate in the first place, especially for female photographer. If this is a money making business, then should not complain. Female photographers taking male nude shoots should be careful lor, better to have a guy assistant. If female photographer cannot tolerate inappropriate act, then it would be advisable not to take male nude shoots. Happy shooting.:nono: :sweat:

 

[benedium]

How come male photographer for nude female not so dodgy ah?

 

[Red Indian Chief]

I got an e-mail two weeks ago. the Name of the e-mail was Joseph. But in the letter, it ends with Mark.

Sigh, everyone has a different name on the internet. For example, Lord Angelus is a nick name for Joey. Maybe even Joey is not your real name either. Do nude shoot after all is not glamourous. It's natural to have a fake name. The same for firestone, morbidbear, simon edward and the rest. Everyone use fake name.:nono: :lovegrin: Don't complain about others when you are doing the same.

 

[Cheesecake]

Sigh, everyone has a different name on the internet. For example, Lord Angelus is a nick name for Joey. Maybe even Joey is not your real name either. Do nude shoot after all is not glamourous. It's natural to have a fake name. The same for firestone, morbidbear, simon edward and the rest. Everyone use fake name.:nono: :lovegrin: Don't complain about others when you are doing the same.

wa, 1st post!!! :bsmilie: :thumbsup:

 

[Long Thai Bean]

wa, 1st post!!! :bsmilie: :thumbsup:

1st post in CS ... but prob not 1st time in CS .....

 

[ClearHead777]

wow, 85 years old still can do pole dancing:thumbsup: :bsmilie:

 

[ClearHead777]

How come male photographer for nude female not so dodgy ah?

'cause male see nude girl will :bigeyes: :bsmilie:

 

[BlackBird]

ClearHead777, u very funny leh. Singaporean are quite westernised, but not open-minded enough. Certain things are still very conservative and tradition. :blah: :complain: :mad2: :kok:

 

[Cheesecake]

ClearHead777, u very funny leh. Singaporean are quite westernised, but not open-minded enough. Certain things are still very conservative and tradition. :blah: :complain: :mad2: :kok:

1st post too! welcome!!!:bsmilie:

 

[morbidbear]

Dear Mr sporean2006/kevin/tony/alvin/whatever your name is,

Please stop insulting my intelligence. Calling me again with the same mobile number, same voice, but changing your name again doesn't make you a new person.



Dear Red Indian Chief,

Yes, you are right. Everyone has a different name on the internet. But you forget that it is a username.

If you want to sell your camera to someone, would you call him and identify yourself as Tom today, Dick tomorrow and Harry the day after tomorrow?




"If photographer cannot tolerate any inappropriate act in nude shoot, then it is advisable not to take nude shoots in future."
So you mean that sexually offensive acts are acceptable and should be tolerated in nude shoots?

 

[sehsuan]

I've got one good suggestion to solve the problem. Get a Domme to take photos of the "model", in the company of guys - bouncers. Make that, MANY bouncers. Problem solved.

 

[zaxh81]

Now got nude everyone register to post.:thumbsup:

 

[Long Thai Bean]

Now got nude everyone register to post.:thumbsup:

Is it "everyone register to post" ??? or ONE register to post many ???

 

[Stereobox]

its a question of freedom of choice and the enigma ying and yang vibes.

:bsmilie: wah, cheem sial~

care to elaborate more on this "enigma ying and yang vibes"? perhaps i can intro you to some photographers who display an enigmatic combination of ying & yang "vibes" =)

Well, I think taking nude photos shoot is already inappropriate in the first place, especially for female. If this is a money making business, then do not complain. Female photographer taking male nude shoots just have to be careful lor. If there is a guy assistant & no sexaul abuse, it's should be alright. If photographer cannot tolerate any inappropriate act in nude shoot, then it is advisable not to take nude shoots in future. Happy shooting. :sweat: :nono:

what a weird logic..i also think there is a difference between sexual abuse and sexual harassment, and both are intolerable, whether male assistant around or not.

anyway, if following your weird logic, the same "advice" can be applied to the following concern from sporean2006..

i rather trust a women photographer to keep the profile private than a male photpgrhaer would may catalogue tag a straight man pic under gay portfolio. i have also heard there are closet gay photogprahers who have a fetish for make nudes this would be to any staright man consternation and would be petrified ,i had heard this from a talent scout who mentoned for male udnerwera shots, the male photogrpahers can get touchy and there has been complaints from the models of being accosted and groped for these shots a woman photographer would be more respectful the female photographer would know what is tasteful and, have seen the workd of female photogrpahers depiction of male nudes and its quite masterful think anne leibowiz for example

weird logic 101:"If model cannot tolerate any inappropriate act in nude shoot, then it is advisable not to take nude shoots in future. Happy shooting"

 

[morbidbear]

seems like Stereobox has the clearest head here.

 

[zaxh81]

Is it "everyone register to post" ??? or ONE register to post many ???

Yes,either way

 

[BlackBird]

It is best for female photographer and the model to sit down to talk about what can be done and what cannot be done during the shoot. This would save both parties from any dispute later. That should solve the problem. :thumbsup:

Sexual abuse has physical contacts. That depends on whether it is the model making the contact with the photographer first or photographer make physical contact with the model first. If there is no physical contact, then there is no sexual abuse. Personally I do not mind what the other party does, so long as there is no physical contact. :sweat:

Sexual harrassment - is an act where the party concern keeps do the same thing many times, only then that can be consider a harrassment. :devil:

I personally have many names on the interent. Michael, BigBird, Ken, Boss, John, Adam, Eric, etc, too many to remember. I use them in different email message to different kinds of people. But, of course, when I want to make contact or phone call with the person, I use only one name, to be sincere. If he change name when making contact, then it would be doubtful.:think:

There are always a lot of cases where different people look at same thing with different perspective. For example, one guy and a woman walk into a hotel. Some people will thing they are having a secret affair in the hotel, while some think they are coming for a holiday. So we should not jump into conclusion in order not to make any mis-judgement.

This are just my opinion. After all, different people have different thinking. No need to be so "gun jeong". Cheers !!!:cheers:

 

[Red Indian Chief]

If photographer cannot tolerate any inappropriate act in nude shoot, then it is advisable not to take nude shoots in future. Happy shooting. :sweat: :nono:

Yayaya, I agree with you.

Qoute " It is best for female photographer and the model to sit down to talk about what can be done and what cannot be done during the shoot. This would save both parties from any dispute later. That should solve the problem. "

BlackBird, you have the point there.:rbounce: :light:

 

[Red Indian Chief]

"If photographer cannot tolerate any inappropriate act in nude shoot, then it is advisable not to take nude shoots in future."

So you mean that sexually offensive acts are acceptable and should be tolerated in nude shoots?

Morbidbear, when he do offensive act, did you or anyone tell him to stop ??? :gbounce: :nono: :hammer:

 

[Dufresne]

What a whole bunch of mcp's here!

I'm sure morbidbear would have asked him to stop. Any self-respecting female would have.

And it does not take repeated attempts to amount to sexual harrasement. Blackbird, judging from the way you speak and assuming you're an alpha type guy (probably homophobic too), if a homosexual flashes his privates to you in a locker room deliberately, just once, would you feel outraged? Honestly?

I'm beginning to wonder where all this defense of sporean2006 is heading.