faster download card reader?


Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if such a fast card reader were to exist, your data transfer would have been bottlenecked by your hard disk (and let's not even consider the data throughput of your cf card), assuming you are using a modern ide/sata hdd writingn around 50mb/s. You have to realize that there's no solution to such high speeds you are looking for. Why do you need to transfer so much data in less than a minute? Would waiting a few minutes more severely hamper your productivity?


no.just that i'm a damn impatient gal.LOL:bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
 

no.just that i'm a damn impatient gal.LOL:bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
then i can only say photography require patient... not just transferring of data. ;)
 

4GB in 20s... I'm not sure even if harddisk to harddisk can reach that speed for most coms.
 

then i can only say photography require patient... not just transferring of data. ;)

i'm patient when waiting for shots, but not patient when d/l the pics!:bsmilie:
 

4GB in 20s... I'm not sure even if harddisk to harddisk can reach that speed for most coms.

i just in dreamland only lah.
just like i keep dreaming nikon will come out with 6-600mm f1.4:bsmilie:
 

i just in dreamland only lah.
just like i keep dreaming nikon will come out with 6-600mm f1.4:bsmilie:
Lol... i think you will need 2 assistant to help you to carry the lens...
okie, jokes aside.

FW card reader will give you a faster copying then a USB 2.0 card reader.
Does your PC/laptop have FW?
 

seriously. it's not worth it to spend the money to get a slight increase in speed in downloads. 5 mins is already fast, so why don't u make yourself a coffee while you wait for the data transfer to complete? it's not like you gotta transfer 4 GB of data every hour such that having a super fast card reader saves you time (money)?

you can always do something else in that 5 mins. or while it's still copying u can open a few files and start editing away.
 

Lol... i think you will need 2 assistant to help you to carry the lens...
okie, jokes aside.

FW card reader will give you a faster copying then a USB 2.0 card reader.
Does your PC/laptop have FW?


fw is firewire?ya have.that's for video d/l right?i remember my bro's viewcam can plug in there and d/l
so essentially i need a FW CF card reader right?

5 mins where got fast.piang eh...damn xian sit there wait.
 

fw is firewire?ya have.that's for video d/l right?i remember my bro's viewcam can plug in there and d/l
so essentially i need a FW CF card reader right?

5 mins where got fast.piang eh...damn xian sit there wait.
the FW port needs to be normal size, not the small 1 for DV... :(
if you have the normal 1, i don't mind to let you test and you see for yourself the speed of copying is the time that you want to wait.
 

the FW port needs to be normal size, not the small 1 for DV... :(
if you have the normal 1, i don't mind to let you test and you see for yourself the speed of copying is the time that you want to wait.

aiya.lidat canot liao.so sad.nvr md lah.thanks for offer.
i'll just do something to occupy myself for 5 mins.
 

the FW port needs to be normal size, not the small 1 for DV... :(
if you have the normal 1, i don't mind to let you test and you see for yourself the speed of copying is the time that you want to wait.

Got adapter that can convert between the big and small connector one.
 

Let's look at this logically instead of blindly following the blind.
Forget about getting another card reader.

Given you have a fast card, 150X card (150 * 145kb [yes, that is the official 1x speed] = 22mb/s).

4000/22 = 182 seconds = 3 min at least.

That's assuming you can hit a sustained 22mb/s (don't even dream, there's none) instead of a burst of 22mb/s.

Even with Extreme III, they can only promise a sustained 20mb/s for sequential read/writes (best case situation) Meaning, unless you are writing/reading a single 4gb sized file file, you will not hit 20mb/s.

Given that each RAW file is say, 10mb, and for each file you have to perform a read of the FAT Table.. you're more realistically hitting (estimated) 15mb/s. you'll need 4000/15/60 = 4.44min for the entire 4gb.

Use any USB 2.0+ card reader, they won't differ much.
 

Let's look at this logically instead of blindly following the blind.
Forget about getting another card reader.

Given you have a fast card, 150X card (150 * 145kb [yes, that is the official 1x speed] = 22mb/s).

4000/22 = 182 seconds = 3 min at least.

That's assuming you can hit a sustained 22mb/s (don't even dream, there's none) instead of a burst of 22mb/s.

Even with Extreme III, they can only promise a sustained 20mb/s for sequential read/writes (best case situation) Meaning, unless you are writing/reading a single 4gb sized file file, you will not hit 20mb/s.

Given that each RAW file is say, 10mb, and for each file you have to perform a read of the FAT Table.. you're more realistically hitting (estimated) 15mb/s. you'll need 4000/15/60 = 4.44min for the entire 4gb.

Use any USB 2.0+ card reader, they won't differ much.
I know what you mean but...
Have you use a FW card reader??? :sweat:
 

i use both usb2 and firewire.. download at the sametime cos.. each time i come back, 6 cards full... some 2gb cards some 4gb cards... :sweat: :bsmilie:
 

I know what you mean but...
Have you use a FW card reader??? :sweat:

er I think the question is more of.. have you used a USB2 card reader b4? :bsmilie:

Be it a FW400 or FW800 or USB2, You won't see any marked speed difference if you're not using a Extreme IV CF..

If you really really need speed, get a FW800 card reader and a Extreme IV CF card. Shouldn't cost you more than $1k.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top