Expose Yourself - CXXV

[edutilos-]

So ex? X100 only 1.4k now leh.

Oh no la..

Guys, wonder isit worth to get the x10 at $899 with card and leather case, or $849 with card. The only diff is the leather case. From this comparison, its like the case is worth $50.

 

[zac08]

I think street ~$1200-$1300? Can't remember if with or without GST..

Will drop one la..

The Fuji forum seems to put it about $900 for now. at a package deal.

 

[Yapster]

X10 can zoom!!! Lol!

You Canon PnS also can!!!!! LOL!

 

[edutilos-]

Wa.... I just google... this camera is 40 megapixel.... should be amazing for landscape.....

It's not the mega pixels... It's the sensor.

But not so portable? And then the lenses won't be as wide as 10mm perspective.

Different format also, square I think..

 

[Yapster]

I think need to use good camera then can sharpen 10 times..


I sharpen 10 times and get this... But wa, sibeh detailed, file size at 100% = 700+ KB!!!

You not using Leica lens ma! No Leica glow, how to sharpen swee swee? LOL!

 

[andrewtansj]

It's not the mega pixels... It's the sensor.

But not so portable? And then the lenses won't be as wide as 10mm perspective.

Different format also, square I think..

Image stitch 10 40megapixel raw files!!!

 

[edutilos-]

Everytime I see X100 I think of this quote from Clubsnap.

To all of you that complain that the X100 is too expensive: Don't hate the camera cos you guys are too broke to afford it. It's not even half the price of my M9P and D3X.

To all of you that complain that the X100 is a fixed lens camera: So what? Just shoot within the camera's zoom range. Don't hate the camera for your incompetence.

To all of you that complain about the X100' slow AF - Yes I hear you. It's slow, so what? A little more patience and a little more anticipation never killed anyone.

To all of you that complain that the X100's sensor is a 1.5x APS-C - Try hitting the same low noise level with your puny micro 4/3 camera at ISO3200.

Quit whining and just get the camera that suits you best. You guys make me sick.

:bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie:

 

[zac08]

It's not the mega pixels... It's the sensor.

But not so portable? And then the lenses won't be as wide as 10mm perspective.

Different format also, square I think..

crop lor... so much megapixels... can crop all you like... haha

 

[MGohzxc]

It's not the mega pixels... It's the sensor.

But not so portable? And then the lenses won't be as wide as 10mm perspective.

Different format also, square I think..

Oh I see....... so the sensor is larger...

 

[edutilos-]

Image stitch 10 40megapixel raw files!!!

I think Van's computer will hang.

Mine won't. :bsmilie:

Everytime I use my computer I think back of the times when I was using a 1.6 Celeron laptop to process my K100D photos and Photoshop would crash half the time.

And life is beautiful. :bsmilie:

 

[MGohzxc]

Image stitch 10 40megapixel raw files!!!

Calculate this way ???

 

[edutilos-]

Calculate this way ???

You must try stitching large large files sometime... Then open in Photoshop.. :bsmilie:

The image is composed of 1512 individual photos stitched together. The final hi-res file is 250,739 X 33,079 pixels or 8,294 megapixels.

http://www.gigapixel.com/image/gigapan-cypress.html

And it's not the largest, IIRC!

 

[andrewtansj]

Calculate this way ???

Haha I mean use the Pentax 645 to shoot panorama computer will hang

 

[edutilos-]

http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/kopitiam/1010136-remove-not-remove.html

Faint...

Future threads...

1. To drink water when processing photos, or not?
2. To hum a tune when shooting, or not?
3. To on air-con when sleeping, or not?

 

[MGohzxc]

Haha I mean use the Pentax 645 to shoot panorama computer will hang

Oh. I see... one photo 40 megapixel, 5 photos is 200. Wa.. computer die.............

 

[MGohzxc]

You must try stitching large large files sometime... Then open in Photoshop.. :bsmilie:



Gigapixel.com - Vancouver from Cypress Mountain Lookout

And it's not the largest, IIRC!

Actually not yet try Wa... this one 8 thousand over mega pixel.........

 

[andrewtansj]

You must try stitching large large files sometime... Then open in Photoshop.. :bsmilie:

http://www.gigapixel.com/image/gigapan-cypress.html

And it's not the largest, IIRC!

Use Pentax 645 shoot cityscape can capture a lot more details... U can see pple digging nose in office few kilometers away... Lol!

 

[edutilos-]

500px / Photo "Descent" by Pawel Klarecki

 

[andrewtansj]

http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/kopitiam/1010136-remove-not-remove.html

Faint...

Future threads...

1. To drink water when processing photos, or not?
2. To hum a tune when shooting, or not?
3. To on air-con when sleeping, or not?

Lol! Tell him remove liao value will drop... Cause the tape cause money

 

[edutilos-]

Use Pentax 645 shoot cityscape can capture a lot more details... U can see pple digging nose in office few kilometers away... Lol!

Lollollol!!!!!

Hard drive disappear very fast also.